Multi-column SEM Array Spacing for Photomask Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-column scanning electron microscopy (SEM) systems face inefficiencies in inspecting photomasks/reticles and wafers due to suboptimal spacing of electron-optical columns, leading to increased inspection time and potential charging issues, which hinder high-resolution characterization and defect detection in semiconductor manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

A multi-column assembly with electron-optical columns arranged in an array with specific spacings that correspond to the dimensions of inspection areas, allowing for efficient characterization of multiple field areas on a sample surface, minimizing overlap, and optimizing inspection time by aligning images post-processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If multiple electron-optical columns are spaced to cover a larger total inspection area, then the inspection coverage is improved, but the inspection time increases and charging interference occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection area coverageVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the inspection task into multiple independent electron-optical columns, each responsible for a specific inspection area. The spacing between columns is optimized so that each column inspects a discrete region without excessive overlap, allowing parallel inspection of multiple areas simultaneously while minimizing redundant scanning and total inspection time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different spacing configurations for different columns based on their specific inspection requirements and positions. Columns are strategically positioned and spaced to match the field area dimensions, ensuring optimal coverage without unnecessary overlap that would increase inspection time or cause charging interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Area of stationary object

If multiple electron-optical columns are spaced to cover a larger total inspection area, then the inspection coverage is improved, but charging interference occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection area coverageVSAvoidcharging interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection area is segmented into discrete regions assigned to individual electron-optical columns with optimized spacing. This segmentation ensures that columns are positioned far enough apart to minimize charging interference while maintaining comprehensive coverage of the field area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spacing between columns is locally optimized based on their specific positions and the field area dimensions. Columns near the edges or in sensitive regions are spaced to avoid charging interference, while columns in more robust areas may be spaced closer to maximize coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If the number of electron-optical columns is increased, then the inspection throughput is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multiple independent electron-optical columns that function as separate inspection units. Each column operates independently with its own scanning and detection capabilities, allowing the system to achieve high throughput through parallel processing while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the number, spacing, and positioning of electron-optical columns as key parameters to achieve the desired throughput while controlling complexity. By carefully selecting these parameters based on field area dimensions and inspection requirements, the system achieves optimal performance without unnecessary complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the sensitivity and throughput of photomask/reticle and wafer inspection processes, reducing the time required for high-resolution characterization and minimizing interference from charging, thereby improving defect detection and semiconductor device quality.

Implementation Method 1

a first electron-optical column of the plurality of electron-optical columns is configured to characterize a first inspection area within a first instance of the particular field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS10777377B2Multi-column spacing for photomask and reticle inspection and wafer print check verification
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 KLA CORP
  • US10777377B2 patent drawing
  • US10777377B2 patent drawing
  • US10777377B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-column assembly for a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) system is disclosed. The multi-column assembly includes a plurality of electron-optical columns arranged in an array defined by one or more spacings. Each electron-optical column includes one or more electron-optical elements. The plurality of electron-optical columns is configured to characterize one or more field areas on a surface of a sample secured on a stage. The number of electron-optical columns in the plurality of electron-optical columns equals an integer number of inspection areas in a field area of the one or more field areas. The one or more spacings of the plurality of electron-optical columns correspond to one or more dimensions of the inspection areas.