Multi-Head Steel Coil Cutting Apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual process of cutting defective steel coils into smaller sections for re-melting is time-consuming and frustrating, as it requires multiple cuts and can be labor-intensive.

Innovation Solution

An automated steel coil cutting apparatus with multiple cutting heads attached to an automated arm, featuring a cooling system, gas flow regulation, and a centering detection device, which allows for precise cutting along the coil's axis with controlled speed and gas flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single hand held torch is used for manual cutting, then the process is simple to operate, but the cutting time is excessive and multiple passes are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting speedVSAvoidapparatus structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting apparatus divides the cutting function into multiple independent cutting heads (typically 3-5 torches) arranged radially around the coil axis. Each cutting head operates independently to cut a portion of the coil wall, allowing simultaneous multi-point cutting that dramatically reduces total cutting time compared to a single torch approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple cutting heads are merged into a single integrated apparatus that rotates with the coil. The cutting heads, cooling system, gas regulation, and detection devices are combined into one unified system mounted on the coil support structure, enabling coordinated multi-head cutting operation from a single platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Loss of time

If the coil is cut along its length from top to bottom, then the cutting path is straightforward, but the coil opens up requiring additional cuts and increasing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal cutting timeVSAvoidcutting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting approach transitions from linear top-to-bottom cutting to radial cutting around the coil's circumferential dimension. Multiple torches positioned at different angular positions cut simultaneously around the coil wall, effectively utilizing the radial dimension to reduce the number of passes needed and prevent coil opening issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The rotating apparatus maintains continuous cutting action as it travels around the coil with the material flow. The multiple cutting heads ensure that cutting operation continues uninterrupted around the entire coil circumference, eliminating idle time between passes and maintaining constant material removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If multiple cutting heads are used to cut simultaneously, then cutting efficiency increases, but control and precision of each head becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting efficiencyVSAvoidcutting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Each cutting head is equipped with or controlled by individual flow regulators that provide feedback control of gas flow rates. The system monitors and adjusts the oxygen and fuel gas flow to each torch independently, ensuring consistent cutting performance and precision across all cutting heads despite variations in positioning or coil geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus controls cutting precision by independently adjusting parameters such as gas flow rate, torch-to-coil distance, and cutting speed for each cutting head. By varying these parameters individually for each torch, the system maintains optimal cutting conditions and precision across multiple simultaneous cutting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of time

If the cutting heads are passed quickly through the coil center, then cutting time is reduced, but control of gas flow and cooling becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting cycle timeVSAvoidprocess control stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is pre-positioned and pre-cooled before cutting begins, with coolant flow paths already established to each cutting head. Gas flow regulators are pre-adjusted to optimal settings before the cutting operation starts, ensuring immediate and stable control when the apparatus engages the coil, eliminating delays and control instability during the cutting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus significantly reduces the time and effort required for cutting steel coils, enabling efficient reuse of materials by making multiple cuts in a single pass, thereby saving time and resources.

Implementation Method 1

A cooling system may cool the cutting heads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 2

A low melting point starter may be attached to one of the cutting heads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Data Source

PatentUS7485192B2Steel coil cutting apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2009.02.03 EDW C LEVY CO
  • US7485192B2 patent drawing
  • US7485192B2 patent drawing
  • US7485192B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A steel coil cutting apparatus that overcomes these and other problems has an automated arm having a free end. At least two cutting heads are attached to the free end of the automated arm.