Multi-Layer Heat Sink With Extension Columns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional heat sinks face challenges in enhancing heat dissipation efficiency due to limited airflow and structural strength issues, as increasing the number or height of radiating fins reduces gap width, leading to increased airflow resistance and potential deformation, while single configurations fail to address varying heat sources effectively.

Innovation Solution

A heat sink structure featuring multiple radiating fin assemblies stacked in layers with varying gap sizes and thicknesses, secured by extension columns and support sections, allowing for flexible arrangement and enhanced airflow, and incorporating different fin configurations to optimize heat exchange across the surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If the number of radiating fins is increased to enlarge heat dissipation area, then heat dissipation area is improved, but gap between adjacent fins becomes narrower leading to increased airflow resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation areaVSAvoidairflow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The heat sink is divided into multiple layers with different fin configurations. Each layer contains radiating fins with different gap sizes, allowing the system to simultaneously provide large heat dissipation area and adequate airflow channels. The segmentation into layered structures enables different regions to serve different functions in heat dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the heat sink have different fin gap characteristics. Some areas have smaller gaps for maximum heat dissipation area, while other areas have larger gaps to reduce airflow resistance. This local variation in quality allows optimization of both heat dissipation area and airflow characteristics in different zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Area of stationary object

If the height of radiating fins is increased to enlarge heat dissipation area, then heat dissipation area is improved, but radiating fins become thin and prone to deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation areaVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of simply increasing fin height in one dimension, the design transitions to a multi-layered three-dimensional structure. This allows heat dissipation area to be expanded in the vertical stacking direction rather than solely by increasing individual fin height, thereby maintaining fin thickness and structural strength while achieving larger total heat dissipation area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If the thickness of radiating fins is increased to prevent deformation, then structural strength is improved, but number of radiating fins is reduced leading to decrease of heat dissipation area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidheat dissipation area
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The design utilizes the vertical stacking dimension to compensate for the reduction in fin count caused by increased thickness. By arranging multiple layers of thicker fins vertically, the total heat dissipation area is maintained or enhanced while each individual fin has sufficient thickness for structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If one heat sink is directly overlaid on another heat sink to achieve higher heat dissipation efficiency, then heat dissipation efficiency is improved, but weight of upper heat sink applies pressure causing deformation of radiating fins

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation efficiencyVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Support columns are introduced as intermediary elements between the upper and lower heat sink layers. These support columns bear the weight of the upper layer and distribute the load, preventing direct pressure on the radiating fins and thus avoiding deformation while maintaining the stacked configuration for enhanced heat dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

5Ease of manufacture

If single configuration of radiating fins is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but heat dissipation performance cannot be optimized for varying heat sources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidheat dissipation performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The heat sink is segmented into multiple layers, each with different fin configurations suitable for different heat dissipation requirements. This segmentation allows customization of heat dissipation characteristics in different regions while still using standardized manufacturing processes for each layer type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the heat sink have different fin configurations tailored to local heat dissipation needs. Areas with higher heat generation can have fins optimized for maximum heat transfer, while other areas can have different configurations, all within a manufacturable multi-layer structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances heat dissipation efficiency by optimizing airflow and structural integrity, providing customizable heat exchange performance for different areas and preventing deformation when layers are overlaid, thus addressing the limitations of conventional heat sinks.

Implementation Method 1

the heat sink contacts and is attached to a heat source (such as a central processing unit or a graphics processing chip) for conducting the heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

the radiating fins of the heat sink outward dissipate the heat by way of radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat radiation: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 3

The heat is outward dissipated by way of heat radiation so as to achieve the object of heat dissipation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat convection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS11917795B2Heat sink structure
Publication Date: 2024.02.27 ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO LTD
  • US11917795B2 patent drawing
  • US11917795B2 patent drawing
  • US11917795B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A heat sink structure includes a base seat and at least one heat dissipation unit. The base seat has a first face and a second face. At least one extension column extends from the second face of the base seat. The heat dissipation unit is disposed above the base seat and spaced from the base seat by a gap. The extension column serves to restrict or secure the heat dissipation unit in horizontal and vertical directions. The heat dissipation unit with different structures provides multiple heat dissipation features to enhance the entire heat dissipation performance.