Multi-piston Caliper Radially Staggered Bores Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing brake systems with fixed opposed calipers face challenges in reducing weight while maintaining stopping power and performance, particularly in the arrangement and configuration of pistons and bores relative to a rotor, which affects braking efficiency and weight distribution.

Innovation Solution

The caliper design features radially staggered and asymmetrically located bores on both sides, with some bores partially or entirely covered by pockets and boot grooves, allowing for the formation of non-overlapping circumferential tracks on the rotor and optimized piston alignment for improved braking performance and reduced weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If fixed opposed brake systems use two or more pistons on each side of a rotor arranged in a line following the curvature of the rotor, then stopping power and performance are maintained, but weight reduction is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecaliper weightVSAvoidstopping power
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by radially staggering the bores on the inboard and outboard sides of the caliper, creating an asymmetric piston arrangement relative to the rotor. This asymmetric configuration allows for optimized weight distribution and material removal while maintaining effective braking force through proper piston positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a conventional linear arrangement of pistons to a multi-dimensional configuration by radially staggering bores at different positions and introducing asymmetric positioning. This dimensional change allows pistons to be distributed more efficiently in three-dimensional space, enabling weight reduction while preserving stopping power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Weight of moving object

If pistons are staggered within the respective sides of the caliper to reduce weight, then weight is reduced, but braking efficiency may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecaliper weightVSAvoidbraking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by positioning specific bores at different radial locations on the inboard and outboard sides of the caliper. Each bore is strategically placed to optimize its local contribution to braking efficiency while allowing overall weight reduction through the staggered configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates pockets that partially or entirely radially cover the bores, performing preliminary material removal and structural preparation. This preliminary action optimizes the piston arrangement for both weight reduction and braking efficiency before the actual braking operation occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Weight of moving object

If bores are radially staggered and asymmetrically located on trailing and leading sides of a bisecting plane, then weight is reduced and performance optimized, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecaliper weightVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the caliper structure by dividing the bore positions into distinct groups on the inboard and outboard sides, with each side having its own staggered pattern. This segmentation allows for modular manufacturing approaches and simplifies the production of complex asymmetric configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses pockets that partially or entirely cover the bores, creating a nested structure where the pocket contains the bore. This nesting simplifies manufacturing by combining multiple features into integrated structures, reducing the number of separate machining operations required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Reliability

If multiple non-overlapping circumferential tracks are formed on the rotor, then braking performance is improved, but the complexity of piston alignment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking performanceVSAvoidpiston alignment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric and radially staggered bore arrangement naturally creates non-overlapping circumferential tracks on the rotor when pistons are positioned. This asymmetric configuration simplifies the alignment process by eliminating the need for complex overlapping track designs while maintaining effective braking performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses radial staggering to create tracks at different radial positions, adding a radial dimension to the track configuration. This dimensional approach allows multiple non-overlapping tracks to be formed without increasing circumferential complexity, as the tracks are differentiated by their radial positions rather than just their circumferential locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10539199B2Multi-piston caliper
Publication Date: 2020.01.21 AKEBONO BRAKE IND CO LTD
  • US10539199B2 patent drawing
  • US10539199B2 patent drawing
  • US10539199B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A caliper comprising: (a) an inboard side; (b) an outward side, wherein the inboard side and the outboard side include three or more bores that are radially staggered relative to two or more of the bores; and (c) a pocket located within a central region of the inboard side, the outboard side, or both; wherein the bores on the inboard side, the outboard side, or both are positioned so that: (i) all of the bores are located entirely radially below the pocket; (ii) none of the bores are located below the pocket; (iii) one or more of the bores are located partially radially below the pocket; (iv) one or more of the bores are located entirely radially below the pocket; (v) one or more of the bores are not located partially or entirely radially below the pocket; or (vi) a combination of (iii) through (v).