Multi-Robot Load Control for Synchronized Maintenance Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robot control systems fail to synchronize the timing of component replacements across multiple robots, leading to varying maintenance times and reduced productivity due to unpredictable failure predictions.

Innovation Solution

A controller system that includes a failure prediction section to predict the failure time of each robot and a load adjustment section to adjust the work load of each robot based on the predicted failure times, ensuring all robots operate until a common maintenance time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If component replacement is performed based on individual failure predictions for each robot, then reliability is improved by preventing unexpected failures, but productivity deteriorates due to varying maintenance times causing production disruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot failure preventionVSAvoidproduction continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the maintenance scheduling of multiple robots by synchronizing their operation loads so that they reach their maintenance timepoints simultaneously. This allows consolidated maintenance activities instead of individual maintenance events, ensuring reliability through timely replacements while maintaining productivity by minimizing production disruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the operation loads of robots based on their individual failure predictions. By flexibly modifying work assignments and operation intensities, the system guides robots to converge on a common maintenance timepoint, resolving the contradiction between preventive maintenance requirements and production continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If maintenance is performed at different times for different robots based on individual failure predictions, then reliability is improved by addressing each robot's specific needs, but productivity worsens due to repeated maintenance activities and labor inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual robot reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual maintenance schedules into a single synchronized maintenance event. By adjusting operation loads, robots that would have required maintenance at different times are instead guided to reach their maintenance timepoints together, eliminating repeated maintenance activities and reducing total maintenance time and labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If robot operation loads are adjusted to synchronize maintenance times, then productivity is improved by reducing maintenance disruptions, but device complexity increases due to the need for coordinated load management across multiple robots

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the controller continuously monitors individual robot failure predictions and adjusts operation loads accordingly. This closed-loop control system uses failure prediction data as feedback to dynamically modify maintenance scheduling, achieving synchronized maintenance and improved productivity through automated coordination rather than complex manual planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11931903B2Robot controller and method of controlling robot
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US11931903B2 patent drawing
  • US11931903B2 patent drawing
  • US11931903B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller for controlling a plurality of robots includes a failure prediction section configured to predict a failure time for each of the robots; and a load adjustment section configured to perform adjustment of a work load of each of the robots according to each of the predicted failure times, so that each of the robots operates until a maintenance time determined in common to each of the robots.