Multi-stage cooking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cooking systems are inefficient in automating the process of cooking, transporting, and dispensing food ingredients, leading to high labor and operational costs due to the lack of integrated mechanisms for simultaneous cooking, stirring, and food handling.

Innovation Solution

A comprehensive cooking system comprising multiple apparatuses, including a first cooking apparatus with baskets and holders for ingredient containment, and a second cooking apparatus with cookware and motion mechanisms for stirring and dispensing, along with a transfer apparatus for moving cooked food to containers, all controlled by a computer system for coordinated operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate cooking apparatuses are used for deep frying, stir frying, and food dispensing, then cooking functionality is comprehensive, but labor cost and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking functionalityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple cooking functions (deep frying, stir frying, food dispensing) into a single integrated cooking system. The system merges the first cooking apparatus for deep frying, the second cooking apparatus for stir frying, and the food dispensing mechanism into one coordinated unit, thereby reducing operational complexity while maintaining comprehensive cooking functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooking system is designed with multi-functional capabilities where a single system can perform multiple cooking operations. The cookware can be used for both deep frying and stir frying, and the motion apparatus can perform both stirring and food dispensing functions, achieving versatility without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If manual handling and transportation of food ingredients is performed, then operational simplicity is maintained, but labor cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The cooking system incorporates automatic food dispensing functionality where the cooked food is automatically transferred from the cookware to the food container through the motion apparatus. This self-service mechanism reduces the need for manual handling while maintaining ease of operation through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated motion mechanisms are added for stirring and dispensing, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooking efficiencyVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motion apparatus is designed with multi-functionality to perform both stirring and food dispensing operations. By using a single motion mechanism that can execute multiple actions, the system increases productivity without proportionally increasing mechanism complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The stirring mechanism and food dispensing mechanism are merged into a single motion apparatus. This consolidation allows the system to achieve high productivity through automated operations while keeping the overall device complexity manageable by sharing common components and control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Extent of automation

If integrated cooking system is implemented, then labor cost is reduced, but initial investment and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple cooking functions and automated operations into a unified platform. By merging the deep frying apparatus, stir frying apparatus, and food dispensing system into one integrated unit, the patent achieves high automation level while managing system complexity through shared components and coordinated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system significantly reduces labor and operational costs by automating the cooking process, ensuring efficient transportation and dispensing of cooked food, thereby enhancing productivity and reducing manual handling.

Implementation Method 1

a liquid container configured to contain a liquid (e.g., oil for deep frying, water for boiling) and a heater configured to heat the liquid therein

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11717115B2Multi-stage cooking
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 HE ZHENGXU
  • US11717115B2 patent drawing
  • US11717115B2 patent drawing
  • US11717115B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application firstly discloses a cooking system including a second cooking apparatus and a first cooking apparatus, which is used to deep fry or boil a food or food ingredients. A semi-cooked food is produced in the first cooking apparatus and is used as an ingredient in the second cooking apparatus. The cooking apparatuses work together to produce a cooked food.