Multi-Modal Transport Scheduling Integrating Fixed and On-Demand Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multi-modal transportation networks struggle to integrate private and public transportation systems effectively, leading to inefficient route planning and increased environmental impact, as conventional methods fail to optimize joint scheduling across different transportation modes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize autonomous vehicles for last-mile transportation, integrating fixed schedule vehicles with flexibly scheduled commuter vehicles, employing optimization algorithms to assign passengers and vehicles based on itinerary requests, arrival time windows, and route optimization to minimize travel time and energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional routing methods are used separately for private and public transportation networks, then each network can be optimized independently, but integration between the two networks is poor and true multi-modal route planning cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges private transportation network routing with public transportation network routing into a unified multi-modal routing system. The system integrates both networks by allowing route planning that seamlessly transitions between private vehicles and public transport, optimizing the combined journey rather than treating them as separate entities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The routing system is designed to be universal, handling multiple transportation modes (private vehicles, public transport, walking, cycling) within a single platform. The system can plan routes using any combination of these modes, making it adaptable to various user needs and transportation infrastructures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If fixed schedule vehicles are used for mass transportation, then operational efficiency is improved, but flexibility in passenger scheduling and routing is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidscheduling flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts routing plans based on real-time conditions, passenger requests, and vehicle availability. While fixed schedule vehicles maintain their schedules for operational efficiency, the system provides flexible routing options by allowing passengers to combine fixed schedule segments with on-demand private transport segments, creating adaptable multi-modal journeys.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The journey is segmented into multiple legs, where some segments use fixed schedule vehicles and others use flexible private transport. This segmentation allows the system to maintain the operational efficiency of fixed schedules while providing flexibility through alternative segments, enabling passengers to optimize their overall travel experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If autonomous vehicles are deployed for last-mile transportation, then service coverage and accessibility are improved, but system complexity and infrastructure requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Autonomous vehicles serve as intermediaries between public transport hubs and final destinations, bridging the gap in the last-mile connectivity. The system integrates these vehicles into the existing public transport network, allowing passengers to transfer from fixed schedule vehicles to autonomous vehicles for the final leg of their journey, thereby extending service coverage without requiring complete system replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of time

If optimization algorithms are used to assign passengers to vehicles, then travel time and energy consumption are reduced, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel timeVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies optimization algorithms selectively to critical decision points in the routing process, such as determining the optimal combination of transportation modes and assigning passengers to specific vehicles. Rather than optimizing every aspect of the system, the focus is placed on key areas that have the greatest impact on travel time and efficiency, balancing computational requirements with performance benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20190392368A1System and Method for Scheduling Multiple Modes of Transport
Publication Date: 2019.12.26 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES INC
  • US20190392368A1 patent drawing
  • US20190392368A1 patent drawing
  • US20190392368A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for assigning commuter vehicles (CVs) in a multi-modal transportation network having the CVs and fixed schedule vehicles to passengers is disclosed. The system receives itinerary requests from the passengers, wherein the itinerary requests of the passengers include initial locations, target locations, departure times from the initial locations, and arrival time windows including deadlines at the target locations. The system includes a memory to store computer executable programs including a grouping program, a route-search program, an operation route map program of the CVs, and a commuter assigning program, and a processor to perform steps of the programs in connection with the memory, wherein the steps include grouping the passengers into a set of groups, assigning the CVs to the groups by performing the commuter assigning program and generating assignment information of assigned CVs among the available CVs.