MW-band Power Choke EMI Filter for DC Motor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing DC motor EMI filters fail to meet CISPR 25, class 5 requirements for MW frequency band emission suppression, particularly due to high input capacitance needs and inadequate transient current control capabilities.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating MW-band power chokes, preferably tunable ferrite-core or SMD chokes, into the EMI filter circuit to reduce input capacitance and enhance EMI suppression in the MW frequency band, while allowing for transient current control, with optional varistors for surge protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional EMI chokes and grounding capacitors are used to suppress EMI, then EMI suppression is achieved, but the input capacitance becomes too large for transient current control applications

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI suppressionVSAvoidinput capacitance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electrical parameters by introducing MW-band power chokes with specific inductance values (25-125 μH) to alter the impedance characteristics in the MW frequency band, enabling EMI suppression with lower capacitance values suitable for transient current control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If varistors are used to suppress noise at the source location, then EMI suppression is improved, but large capacitors in excess of 2 μF are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise suppressionVSAvoidcapacitor size
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the electrical parameters by combining varistors with MW-band power chokes having inductance of 25-125 μH, which changes the impedance characteristics to achieve noise suppression with much lower capacitance values (a few hundred nF) instead of exceeding 2 μF

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If high input capacitance is used to suppress MW-band EMI, then EMI suppression criteria are met, but transient current control capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMW-band EMI suppressionVSAvoidtransient current control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electrical parameters by introducing MW-band power chokes with inductance of 25-125 μH, which provides MW-band EMI suppression while maintaining low input capacitance (a few hundred nF) necessary for transient current control applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs tunable-inductance power chokes that allow dynamic adjustment of inductance values to optimize both EMI suppression performance and transient current control characteristics for different operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Object-affected harmful factors

If fixed inductance power chokes are used, then EMI suppression is achieved, but motor performance may be degraded by excessive inductance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI suppressionVSAvoidmotor performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs tunable-inductance power chokes that allow dynamic adjustment of inductance values, enabling optimization of EMI suppression while avoiding excessive inductance that would degrade motor performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the inductance parameter to be adjustable within specific ranges (25-125 μH, preferably 50-100 μH), allowing fine-tuning to achieve EMI suppression without compromising motor performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively meets CISPR 25, class 5 criteria with lower input capacitance, enabling suitable EMI suppression and transient current control, and allows for compact filter design with tunable inductance to optimize motor performance.

Implementation Method 1

an MW-band power choke coupled to one of the first and second DC-motor-terminal inputs to increase the motor inductance in the MW frequency band

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The MW-band power choke may comprise a ferrite-core coil. The ferrite-core coil may comprise a coil winding around a MnZn ferrite rod

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFerromagnetism: Ferromagnetism

Data Source

PatentUS11606008B2EMI filter for DC motor
Publication Date: 2023.03.14 JOHNSON ELECTRIC INTERNATIONAL AG
  • US11606008B2 patent drawing
  • US11606008B2 patent drawing
  • US11606008B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electromagnetic interference (EMI) filter 32 is provided which is suitable for a DC motor 10. The EMI filter 32 comprises an EMI suppression circuit 34 having first and second DC-motor-terminal inputs 36a, 36b, and an MW-band power choke 44 coupled to one of the first and second DC-motor-terminal inputs 36a, 36b to increase the motor inductance in the MW frequency band.