Neural Architecture Search via Reinforcement Learning Controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neural network architectures often require manual tuning and are inefficient in exploring optimal configurations for specific tasks, leading to suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a controller neural network trained through reinforcement learning to automatically determine the architecture of a child neural network, exploring a large space of possible architectures to identify the most effective configuration for a particular task.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual tuning of neural network architectures is performed, then the architecture can be customized for specific tasks, but the process is inefficient and requires significant user intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask-specific architecture customizationVSAvoidmanual tuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a controller neural network that automatically generates and optimizes child neural network architectures without human intervention. The controller learns to select architectural configurations that perform well on specific tasks by training on a validation set, enabling the system to serve itself in the architecture design process rather than relying on manual tuning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The controller neural network acts as an intermediary between the task requirements and the child neural network architecture. It translates task-specific requirements into appropriate architectural configurations by learning the mapping from task characteristics to optimal architectural parameters, eliminating the need for direct manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If existing neural network architectures are used, then implementation is straightforward, but performance is suboptimal due to inability to explore optimal configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearchitecture implementation easeVSAvoidneural network performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, pre-defined neural network architectures to dynamic, learned architectures. The controller neural network dynamically generates architectural configurations based on task requirements and learns optimal structures through interaction with the environment and validation feedback, enabling the system to adapt architectures rather than being constrained to fixed designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system systematically explores variations in architectural parameters such as layer depths, filter sizes, and connectivity patterns. By learning optimal parameter values through reinforcement learning and validation set evaluation, the system discovers configurations that outperform existing standard architectures while maintaining ease of implementation through automated parameter selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If a large space of possible architectures is explored, then optimal configurations can be identified, but the search process becomes computationally intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearchitecture optimizationVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where the performance of generated architectures on the validation set is evaluated and used to guide further exploration. The controller neural network learns from this feedback, adjusting its architecture generation strategy to focus on promising regions of the search space, thereby reducing unnecessary computational exploration while maintaining optimization effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of architectural configurations using the validation set before full deployment. By assessing architectures early in the training process and using these results to guide subsequent search directions, the system avoids investing excessive computational resources in architectures that are unlikely to perform well, thereby efficiently navigating the large architecture space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11829874B2Neural architecture search
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 GOOGLE LLC
  • US11829874B2 patent drawing
  • US11829874B2 patent drawing
  • US11829874B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for determining neural network architectures. One of the methods includes generating, using a controller neural network, a batch of output sequences, each output sequence in the batch defining a respective architecture of a child neural network that is configured to perform a particular neural network task; for each output sequence in the batch: training a respective instance of the child neural network having the architecture defined by the output sequence; evaluating a performance of the trained instance of the child neural network on the particular neural network task to determine a performance metric for the trained instance of the child neural network on the particular neural network task; and using the performance metrics for the trained instances of the child neural network to adjust the current values of the controller parameters of the controller neural network.