Neutral Atom Qubit Addressing for Simpler Rydberg Gate Hardware

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neutral atom-based quantum computing devices face challenges in executing qubit gate operations with high fidelity due to the need for complex and unreliable laser systems with local spatial control, leading to scalability limitations and power losses, especially for two-qubit gates using optical transitions to Rydberg states.

Innovation Solution

A quantum computing method using a single laser system for both single-qubit and two-qubit gates by employing a qubit addressing laser to perform differential Stark shifts and two-photon transitions, eliminating the need for local spatial control and reducing hardware complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple laser systems with independent addressing units are used for single and two-qubit gates, then local spatial control and gate operation capability are improved, but device complexity and hardware overhead increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate operation capabilityVSAvoidhardware overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single laser system is designed to perform multiple functions by implementing both single-qubit gates and two-qubit gates using the same hardware infrastructure. The laser system can selectively address individual qubits for single-qubit operations and simultaneously address pairs of qubits for two-qubit operations, eliminating the need for separate laser systems and reducing hardware complexity while maintaining full gate operation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the previously separate laser systems for single-qubit and two-qubit gates into a unified laser addressing system. This consolidation integrates the control mechanisms and addressing units into a single coherent system, reducing the number of independent hardware components while preserving the ability to perform both types of quantum gate operations with high fidelity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If dedicated hardware for spatial control (AOMs, AODs, SLMs, DMDs) is used for individual atom addressing, then local spatial control precision is improved, but power losses and hardware complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial control precisionVSAvoidpower losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The spatial control hardware (AOMs, AODs, SLMs, or DMDs) is configured to serve dual purposes: controlling the addressing laser for both single-qubit gates and two-qubit gates. This universal spatial control unit eliminates the need for separate control hardware for different gate types, reducing overall power consumption while maintaining the precision required for selective atom addressing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If rapid switching of laser beams is implemented to minimize heating and qubit loss, then gate operation reliability is improved, but device complexity and control overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate operation reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single control system manages the rapid switching and modulation of the laser beam for both single-qubit and two-qubit gate operations. This unified control mechanism coordinates the timing and intensity modulation of the laser to minimize heating and qubit loss while maintaining reliability, avoiding the need for separate control systems that would increase complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If UV lasers are used for two-qubit gates coupling to Rydberg states, then gate operation capability is improved, but power losses and control difficulty increase due to limited laser technology in UV range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetwo-qubit gate capabilityVSAvoidlaser control ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs an intermediate frequency conversion approach where the laser system operates at a more favorable wavelength (such as visible or near-infrared) for which成熟 technology exists, and uses frequency conversion techniques or multi-photon processes to achieve the required UV transition for Rydberg state coupling. This intermediary approach maintains two-qubit gate capability while avoiding the control difficulties and power losses associated with direct UV laser operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances gate fidelity and scalability by simplifying hardware requirements, allowing reliable operation without the need for complex local control systems, particularly in the UV or XUV range, and improves qubit array initialization and readout processes.

Implementation Method 1

locally and selectively illuminating the qubit prepared in a superposition state |s> of qubit ground state |0> and qubit excited state |1> with a qubit addressing laser at a first qubit addressing laser frequency, to cause a differential Stark shift for the qubit ground state |0> and the qubit excited state |1>

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStark shift:

Implementation Method 2

coupling the pair of qubits to a Rydberg state | r> of the neutral atoms, preferably via a third internal state | c> of the neural atoms that serves as an intermediate state of a two-photon transition from the qubit ground state |0> to the Rydberg state |r>

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTwo-photon transition:

Implementation Method 3

Neutral atom-based quantum computers typically trap neutral atoms (i.e. electrically neutral atoms) in optical potentials (e.g. in arrays of optical dipole traps or in optical lattices)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical trapping: Optical Tweezers

Data Source

PatentEP4485291B1Hardware-efficient neutral atom quantum computing method and device
Publication Date: 2026.04.22 MAX PLANCK GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FOERDERUNG DER WISSENSCHAFTEN EV
  • EP4485291B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4485291B1 patent drawingFigure 2(a)~2(b)
  • EP4485291B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a device and a method for quantum computing using a plurality of neutral atoms in an array of optical traps, wherein a first internal state of the neutral atoms serves as qubit ground state |o>, and a second internal state serves as qubit excited state |1>. According to the present disclosure, a local single-qubit gate operation on a qubit may be performed comprising locally and selectively illuminating the qubit prepared in a superposition state |s> of qubit ground state |o> and qubit excited state |1> with a qubit addressing laser at a first qubit addressing laser frequency to cause a differential Stark shift for the qubit ground state |o> and the qubit excited state |1>, Further, a local two-qubit gate operation may be performed on a pair of qubits comprising locally and selectively illuminating the pair of qubits prepared in the qubit ground state |0> with the qubit addressing laser at a second qubit addressing laser frequency for coupling the pair of qubits to a Rydberg state |r> of the neutral atoms preferably via a third internal state c> of the neural atoms that can serve as an intermediate state of a two-photon transition from the qubit ground state |o> to the Rydberg state |r>.