3D-Stacked NFET/PFET Structures for Density and Width Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing semiconductor devices face challenges in integrating multiple types of field-effect transistors (FETs) with varying polarities and channel widths to achieve high device density and performance.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor device is designed with multiple 3D-stacked FETs of different types, including combinations of n-type and p-type FETs, where the channel widths and number of nanosheet layers are optimized to enhance area efficiency and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple types of FETs with varying polarities and channel widths are integrated, then device density and performance are improved, but manufacturing complexity and process difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The semiconductor device is divided into multiple transistor structures (first transistor structure, second transistor structure, third transistor structure) with different configurations. Each structure contains FETs with specific polarity and channel width combinations, allowing independent optimization of each segment while achieving high overall density. The segmentation enables different manufacturing processes to be applied to different segments based on their specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the semiconductor device have locally optimized characteristics. The first transistor structure has NFETs with greater channel width than PFETs, while the second transistor structure has PFETs with greater channel width than NFETs. The third transistor structure includes FETs with yet another width relationship. This local quality approach allows each region to be tailored for its specific functional requirements while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Speed

If channel widths are optimized for different FET types, then current speed and power efficiency are improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent speedVSAvoidchannel width precision
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Each transistor structure implements locally optimized channel width ratios tailored to its specific FET polarity combinations and functional requirements. The first transistor structure optimizes for NFET-dominant performance with wider NFET channels, the second optimizes for PFET-dominant performance with wider PFET channels, and the third provides additional optimization variants. This local quality approach enables current speed and power efficiency optimization without requiring uniform high-precision manufacturing across all structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs different channel width parameters (W1, W2, W3, W4, W5, W6) with specific relationships (W1>W2, W3>W4, W5>W6) to optimize electrical performance. By varying these dimensional parameters across different transistor structures, the device achieves improved current speed and power efficiency while the parameter relationships provide manufacturing tolerance guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of moving object

If 3D-stacked FET configurations are implemented, then area efficiency is improved, but structural stability challenges arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearea efficiencyVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from planar 2D FET arrangements to 3D-stacked configurations where transistor structures are vertically stacked in multiple levels. The first transistor structure, second transistor structure, and third transistor structure are arranged in three-dimensional space with vertical stacking, dramatically improving area efficiency. The dimensional transition to 3D architecture enables higher device density while the structured design maintains structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The 3D-stacked device is segmented into multiple discrete transistor structures (first, second, and third structures) that can be independently designed and manufactured. Each structure contains specific FET combinations with optimized configurations. This segmentation allows the complex 3D structure to be broken down into manageable units that can be assembled with controlled interconnections, improving both manufacturability and structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260068310A1Semiconductor device including different types of field-effect transistor
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20260068310A1 patent drawing
  • US20260068310A1 patent drawing
  • US20260068310A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a semiconductor device which includes: a 1st transistor structure including a 1st n-type field-effect transistor (NFET) and a 1st p-type field-effect transistor (PFET) vertically thereabove, the 1st NFET having a greater channel width than the 1st PFET; and a 2nd transistor structure including a 2nd PFET and a 2nd NFET vertically thereabove, the 2nd PFET having a greater channel width than the 2nd NFET.