Non-nucleophilic Additives for Probe Array Morphology Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additives used in protein array preparation, such as glycerol, interfere with antibody immobilization on glutaraldehyde-coated surfaces and lead to surface morphological anomalies like 'coffee stain' rings and bright center spots, reducing assay performance due to competition for reactive groups.

Innovation Solution

The use of non-nucleophilic additives, such as dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) or crown ethers, which do not participate in covalent binding and promote homogeneous distribution of probe molecules across the array surface, minimizing surface morphological anomalies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If commonly used additives (glycerol, polyethylene glycol, trehalose, surfactants) are used to keep probe spots hydrated and aid homogeneous distribution, then spot morphology is improved, but these additives contain reactive groups that compete with probe molecules for surface binding sites, reducing immobilization efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespot morphologyVSAvoidimmobilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces non-nucleophilic additives as intermediary substances that perform the beneficial function of maintaining spot hydration and homogeneous distribution without the harmful side effect of competing for surface binding sites. These additives act as mediators between the probe molecules and the surface, enabling proper spot formation while leaving the reactive surface groups available for specific probe immobilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical parameter of the additive from nucleophilic to non-nucleophilic character. By selecting additives lacking nucleophilic reactive groups (such as certain sugars, polyols, or surfactants with blocked reactive groups), the system maintains the physical benefits of additives (hydration, homogeneous distribution) while eliminating the chemical interference with immobilization chemistry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If non-nucleophilic additives are used to avoid competition for reactive groups, then immobilization efficiency is improved, but the ability to remove surface morphological anomalies may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmobilization efficiencyVSAvoidsurface morphological anomalies
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically varies parameters of non-nucleophilic additives including concentration, molecular weight, and chemical structure to optimize both immobilization efficiency and spot morphology. By adjusting these parameters, the patent achieves a balance where the additive concentration is sufficient to prevent morphological anomalies but low enough to avoid any potential interference with immobilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different non-nucleophilic additives or concentrations to different regions or types of probe spots based on their specific requirements. This localized optimization allows each spot type to achieve both high immobilization efficiency and proper morphology by selecting the most appropriate additive conditions for that specific application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the sensitivity of detection systems by reducing pixel variation across array spots, improving the accuracy and efficiency of target molecule detection by eliminating surface morphological anomalies.

Implementation Method 1

promote homogeneous distribution of probe molecules across the array surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

Capillary Flow as the Cause of Ring Stains from Dried Liquid props

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary flow: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 3

the mechanism of surface attachment is the nucleophilic attack on the surface-bound moiety by the probe molecule of interest

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNucleophilic attack: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 4

covalent immobilization of probe molecules

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCovalent bonding: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS9410953B2Use of non-nucleophilic additives for reduction of surface morphological anomalies in probe arrays
Publication Date: 2016.08.09 UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
  • US9410953B2 patent drawing
  • US9410953B2 patent drawing
  • US9410953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a formulations and methods for coupling a reactant (or probe precursor) to a functionalized surface for purposes of forming an arrayed sensor. This method includes the steps of: providing a surface having a reactive functional group; and introducing onto the surface, at a plurality of discrete locations, two or more compositions of the invention, which include a different reactant (probe precursor) and a non-nucleophilic additive, wherein such introduction is carried out under conditions effective to allow for covalent binding of the reactant to the surface via the reactive functional group. This results in a probe-functionalized array that substantially overcomes the problem of surface morphological anomalies on the array surface. Use of the resulting arrays in various detection systems is also encompassed.