Non-Planar Transistor for Embedded DRAM Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies face challenges in scaling down computer memory beyond 22 nm nodes while maintaining low leakage and improved retention time, particularly in integrating DRAM with conventional planar SOI CMOS devices.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming a memory cell with a trench capacitor and a non-planar transistor, such as a finFET, and a self-aligned silicide interconnect electrically coupling the trench capacitor to the non-planar transistor, all within a monolithic silicon substrate, enabling continued device scaling and improved electrostatic shielding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional planar SOI CMOS devices are used, then manufacturing compatibility is maintained, but device scaling beyond 22 nm nodes cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice scaling capabilityVSAvoidtransistor structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from planar 2D transistor structures to three-dimensional multigate structures (FinFET, trigate, nanowire) that wrap around the channel in multiple directions. This dimensional change enables continued scaling beyond 22 nm by providing superior electrostatic control over the channel through gates that contact the channel from top, bottom, and sidewalls, effectively solving the scaling limitation of conventional planar devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nested gate structures where multiple gate electrodes are positioned at different levels and orientations around a central channel region. The gates are nested concentrically or in layered configurations, with inner gates closer to the channel center and outer gates providing additional control, creating a multi-layered electrostatic shielding system that maintains control as device dimensions shrink.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Quantity of substance

If device scaling is pursued to increase density, then memory density improves, but leakage increases and retention time decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory densityVSAvoidleakage and retention time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By moving to three-dimensional multigate structures where gates wrap around the channel from multiple directions (top, bottom, sidewalls), the patent achieves superior electrostatic control that suppresses short-channel effects and leakage currents. This multi-directional gating provides enhanced electrostatic shielding that maintains low leakage and improved retention time even as device dimensions scale down to increase density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite transistor structures combining multiple gate materials with different work functions, dielectric materials with varying permittivities, and channel materials optimized for specific performance characteristics. This composite approach allows tuning of electrostatic control and leakage characteristics to achieve both high density and low leakage/long retention performance simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If multigate devices are implemented, then electrostatic shielding and retention time improve, but integration with conventional planar CMOS becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrostatic shielding and retention timeVSAvoidintegration compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the transistor fabrication process into distinct modules: forming the channel structure (fin, wire, or nanowire), depositing gate materials, creating isolation structures, and forming contacts. Each module can be independently optimized and integrated with conventional CMOS process steps, allowing multigate devices to be incorporated into existing manufacturing lines with minimal disruption to overall process compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent develops universal process modules and material systems for multigate device fabrication that can be applied across different device types (FinFET, trigate, nanowire) and integrated with both n-type and p-type CMOS devices. The same fundamental process techniques and material choices serve multiple functions and device configurations, simplifying integration with conventional planar CMOS technologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9368502B2Replacement gate multigate transistor for embedded DRAM
Publication Date: 2016.06.14 GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC
  • US9368502B2 patent drawing
  • US9368502B2 patent drawing
  • US9368502B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A memory cell, an array of memory cells, and a method for fabricating a memory cell with multigate transistors such as fully depleted finFET or nano-wire transistors in embedded DRAM. The memory cell includes a trench capacitor, a non-planar transistor, and a self-aligned silicide interconnect electrically coupling the trench capacitor to the non-planar transistor.