Non-welded Replaceable Blade Assembly for Slicers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing slicer blade assemblies for high-speed automatic slicing machines are costly due to the need for complete replacement, create sanitation issues with complex clinch mechanisms, and suffer from brittleness caused by welding, leading to increased downtime and maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A slicer blade assembly with removably attached components, eliminating the need for welding, allowing for individual blade replacement without replacing the support members, and featuring adjustable blades for use in multiple slicer configurations, utilizing a tapered retaining nut and U-shaped tabs for a robust, non-welded mechanical bond.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If welding is used to attach blades to support members, then the blade assembly achieves strong structural integrity, but the blades become brittle and prone to weakening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidblade brittleness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The blade assembly is divided into separate modular components: the blade, the support member, and the retention mechanism. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and replaced individually, eliminating the need for welding while maintaining structural integrity through mechanical retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the welding process (thermal/mechanical joining) with a mechanical retention system consisting of a support member with a retention feature and a corresponding retention mechanism. This substitution eliminates the brittleness caused by welding while maintaining strong structural connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If the entire blade assembly is replaced when the blade needs replacement, then the blade is replaced, but the cost increases and downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereplacement costVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The blade assembly is segmented into replaceable blade components and reusable support members. This allows the blade to be replaced independently without replacing the entire assembly, reducing both cost and downtime while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a system where the blade (consumable component) is discarded and replaced, while the support member (durable component) is recovered and reused. This selective replacement strategy reduces waste and lowers the effective cost of blade replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Strength

If a clinch mechanism is used to support blades, then the blades are supported against bending and warping, but the mechanism becomes complex and creates sanitation issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade support stabilityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential function of blade support (preventing bending and warping) from the complex clinch mechanism. The simplified support member provides this function through a straightforward mechanical design that is easier to clean and maintain, eliminating sanitation issues while maintaining blade stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Strength

If multiple welds are made to the blade, then the blade is securely attached, but the blade becomes brittle and potentially weakened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment strengthVSAvoidblade strength
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces multiple welds with a single mechanical retention system consisting of a support member with a retention feature that mechanically secures the blade. This substitution maintains attachment strength while eliminating the brittleness and weakening caused by multiple welds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2723537B1Slice blade assembly with non-welded replaceable blades
Publication Date: 2015.08.26 ATLAS PACIFIC ENG
  • EP2723537B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2723537B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2723537B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A slice blade assembly for various produce items is provided. A circular array of V-shaped blades is carried in an outer support ring. Each blade is held in place by a new non-welded block and nut which interlock with bent tabs formed at the tips of each blade. Each blade is adjustable since each blade is bendable at its apex. Each worn or damaged blade may be removed and replaced without replacing the block and nut that support the blade.