Optical Coherence Tomography Reference Arm Tracking Error Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing measuring methods for surface topology using optical coherence tomography face tracking errors due to delayed responses from robotic axes and reciprocating movements, which affect the accuracy of weld and cut quality analysis.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that guide the reference arm of an optical coherence tomograph along a surface topology using a manipulator and deflection unit, compensating for tracking errors by establishing a planning path length and normalizing measured distances to a standard distance, allowing for error-free inference of surface topology without altering the measuring device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a robot manipulator is used to guide the measuring region along the intended track, then automation and productivity are improved, but tracking errors occur due to delayed response of the axes, worsening measurement precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of surface scanningVSAvoidtracking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously measures the actual distance between the zero point and the workpiece surface at multiple measuring points along the track, compares it with the planning path length, and uses this feedback to normalize the measured distances. This closed-loop approach compensates for tracking errors caused by manipulator inertia and delayed axis response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter representation by normalizing actual distances to a standard distance based on the planning path length. This transformation converts absolute distance measurements into relative position data that is independent of tracking errors, allowing accurate surface topology analysis despite manipulator delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If the manipulator moves quickly to improve productivity, then measurement time is reduced, but mechanical inertia causes lag errors where planned measuring points precede actual measuring points, worsening measurement precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement timeVSAvoidposition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the harmful effect of mechanical inertia and tracking delays into a beneficial normalization process. By measuring actual distances and comparing them with planning path lengths, the system identifies and compensates for lag errors, transforming the problem of speed-induced inaccuracies into a solvable calibration task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary measurements of actual distances at multiple measuring points before final surface topology analysis. These preliminary data points are used to establish the planning path length and create normalization factors that correct for inertial effects during subsequent measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If multiple measurements are carried out point-by-point to improve measurement precision, then accurate surface topology data is obtained, but measurement time increases, worsening productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface topology accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces purely mechanical point-by-point scanning with an optical measurement approach using optical coherence tomography. The measuring device captures distance information optically at multiple points simultaneously or in rapid succession, reducing the time penalty associated with detailed multi-point measurements while maintaining high precision through the normalization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces measurement errors by normalizing actual distances to a standard distance, ensuring accurate surface topology analysis and quality assurance, even in the presence of mechanical inertia and reciprocating movements.

Implementation Method 1

an optical coherence tomograph for measuring an actual distance between a zero point of a measuring region of the optical coherence tomograph and a workpiece surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical coherence tomography: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS10955237B2Measurement method and measurement apparatus for capturing the surface topology of a workpiece
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 BLACKBIRD ROBOTERSYST
  • US10955237B2 patent drawing
  • US10955237B2 patent drawing
  • US10955237B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A measuring device and measuring method for capturing a surface topology of a workpiece uses an optical coherence tomograph having a reference arm guided by a manipulator or a deflection unit to position a measuring region of the scanner. The reference arm is guided along an actual track, which at least partially deviates from an intended track due to disturbing influences like lag errors of the manipulator. An actual distance (dm) between a zero point of the measuring region and a workpiece surface is measured at at least one measuring point of the actual track. A planning path length (Ip) of the reference arm is established for the at least one measuring point for the compensation of the disturbing influences, and the measured actual distance (dm) is normalized to a standard distance (dn) with the aid of the planning path length (Ip).