Offset Pore Microfiltration Device for Circulating Tumor Cell Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cell separation methods, particularly for circulating tumor cells from blood, face challenges such as low recovery rates, variability in surface antigen expression, and mechanical trauma during filtration, which limits the efficiency and viability of captured cells.

Innovation Solution

A microfiltration device with a top and bottom porous membrane, both formed from parylene and assembled using microfabrication techniques, where the pores in the top membrane are offset from those in the bottom membrane, reducing cell membrane tension and enhancing capture efficiency while maintaining cell viability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single porous membrane is used for cell filtration, then the device structure is simple, but the cell capture efficiency is limited and mechanical trauma occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemembrane structureVSAvoidcell capture efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The single membrane is divided into two separate porous membranes (top and bottom) with different pore sizes. The top membrane has larger pores (e.g., 10 μm) while the bottom membrane has smaller pores (e.g., 8 μm), creating a segmented filtration system that improves capture efficiency while reducing mechanical stress on captured cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a two-dimensional single-membrane filtration to a three-dimensional dual-membrane structure with a gap between them. This dimensional change creates a capture zone where cells are trapped between the membranes, significantly improving capture efficiency while the gap reduces mechanical trauma.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If pore sizes are optimized for maximum cell capture, then capture efficiency increases, but mechanical trauma to cell membranes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell capture efficiencyVSAvoidmechanical trauma to cells
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The filtration function is segmented into two membranes with different pore sizes. The top membrane's larger pores allow cells to pass through with minimal trauma, while the bottom membrane's smaller pores provide the primary capture mechanism, distributing the mechanical stress across two structures rather than one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gap between the two membranes acts as a cushioning zone that absorbs mechanical stress. When cells are captured, the gap provides space that reduces the direct mechanical trauma to cell membranes, preserving cell viability while maintaining capture efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Productivity

If dense pore arrangement is used to increase capture efficiency, then more cells are captured, but pore fusion occurs and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell capture efficiencyVSAvoidpore placement uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The pore density requirement is segmented between two membranes. The top membrane can have lower pore density with larger pores, while the bottom membrane has higher pore density with smaller pores. This segmentation allows each membrane to be manufactured with appropriate pore characteristics without requiring extremely high precision in a single membrane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dual-membrane structure acts as a composite filtration system where two different membrane configurations work together. This composite approach allows optimization of each membrane's pore structure independently, achieving high overall capture efficiency while avoiding the pore fusion problems that would occur in a single high-density membrane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device achieves high capture efficiency of viable circulating tumor cells with reduced mechanical trauma, allowing for efficient separation and further analysis, such as immunofluorescent staining and cell viability tests, with up to 86% capture efficiency and maintaining cell integrity for extended periods.

Implementation Method 1

microfiltration device having a top porous membrane and a bottom porous membrane... Filtering may be provided through the capture of cells within the pores of the top membrane or within a gap between the top membrane and the bottom membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicrofiltration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP2238232B1Method and apparatus for microfiltration to perform cell separation
Publication Date: 2019.08.14 CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH
  • EP2238232B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2238232B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4C
  • EP2238232B1 patent drawingFigure 5A~5E

AI summary

A microfiltration apparatus and method for separating cells, such as circulating tumor cells, from a sample using a microfiltration device having a top porous membrane and a bottom porous membrane. The porous membranes are formed from parylene and assembled using microfabrication techniques. The porous membranes are arranged so that the pores in the top membrane are offset from the pores in the bottom membrane.