Light-Confining Layer Refractive Index for OLED Light Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current organic EL display devices face challenges in achieving high emission efficiency and color purity due to limitations in light extraction and resonance structures, particularly in the lateral direction, leading to reduced luminance and increased light loss.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a light-emitting element structure with a first electrode, a partition wall, a light-confining layer with a lower refractive index than the electroluminescence layer, and a second electrode, which creates a resonance structure that enhances light extraction efficiency by reflecting and amplifying light in both vertical and lateral directions, using materials like polyimide and fluorine-containing polymers to optimize refractive index differences and interference effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a conventional light-emitting element structure is used, then the device is simple to manufacture, but light extraction efficiency is poor and emission efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidlight loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a light-confining layer as an intermediary component between the electroluminescence layer and the partition wall. This layer has a refractive index lower than the electroluminescence layer, creating a refractive index gradient that acts as an optical mediator to improve light extraction efficiency by reducing total internal reflection at the interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the refractive index parameter by selecting materials for the light-confining layer with specifically lower refractive indices than the electroluminescence layer. This parameter change creates favorable optical conditions for light extraction while maintaining manufacturing feasibility using conventional organic EL materials and processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If light extraction is improved in the vertical direction, then emission efficiency increases, but light loss in the lateral direction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission efficiencyVSAvoidlateral light loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different optical environments in different spatial regions. The light-confining layer is positioned specifically at the lateral interfaces where light loss occurs, providing localized optical confinement where needed while allowing efficient vertical light extraction in the emission region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent addresses the lateral light loss problem by introducing a new spatial dimension - the light-confining layer extends laterally along the partition wall interface. This dimensional extension creates optical confinement in the lateral direction while preserving vertical extraction pathways, effectively managing light propagation in multiple dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Illumination intensity

If a resonance structure is formed to adjust emission intensity, then emission color can be controlled, but light loss occurs and luminance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission color controlVSAvoidluminance reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the refractive index parameter of the light-confining layer to balance resonance effects and light extraction. By carefully selecting the refractive index to be lower than the electroluminescence layer but not excessively low, the patent achieves favorable resonance conditions for color control while minimizing extraction losses that would reduce luminance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration significantly improves emission efficiency and color purity by minimizing light loss in the lateral direction, resulting in higher luminance and more efficient light extraction, while maintaining high emission efficiency in the front direction.

Implementation Method 1

A refractive index of the light-confining layer is lower than a refractive index of the electroluminescence layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTotal internal reflection: Total Internal Reflection

Implementation Method 2

a resonance structure is formed in a light-emitting element to allow light emission obtained from an emission layer to resonate, thereby adjusting emission intensity and emission color

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 3

it is also possible to adjust an emission wavelength and increase emission intensity in a front direction by utilizing light-interference effects in or outside the light-emitting element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS10553657B2Light-emitting element and display device
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 MAGNOLIA WHITE CORP
  • US10553657B2 patent drawing
  • US10553657B2 patent drawing
  • US10553657B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a light-emitting element including a first electrode, a partition wall covering an edge portion of the first electrode, a light-confining layer in contact with a side surface of the partition wall and the first electrode, an electroluminescence layer over the first electrode and in contact with the first electrode and the light-confining layer, and a second electrode over the electroluminescence layer. A refractive index of the light-confining layer is lower than a refractive index of the electroluminescence layer.