Olefin Production Catalyst with Metal Oxide Composition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for converting saturated hydrocarbon compounds to olefin products are energy intensive and produce undesired by-products, such as methane and heavier hydrocarbons, with limited control over product selectivity and catalyst stability.

Innovation Solution

A hydrocarbon conversion process using a catalyst comprising specific metal oxides, including Si, Al, Pt, W, Sn, and K, operated at mild conditions to achieve high selectivity for olefin production, minimizing by-products like methane and heavier hydrocarbons.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If thermal cracking is used to convert paraffin to olefins, then olefin production is achieved, but energy consumption is high and product selectivity is difficult to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveolefin productionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating parameters by using catalytic cracking at lower temperatures (450-650°C) compared to thermal cracking, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining olefin production efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a catalyst as an intermediary substance to facilitate the conversion of paraffin to olefins, enabling the reaction to proceed under milder conditions with better selectivity control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Temperature

If catalytic cracking with zeolite catalyst is used, then operating conditions are milder, but by-products including methane and C5+ hydrocarbons are produced and catalyst stability is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating temperatureVSAvoidby-products
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite catalyst system combining zeolite with metal oxides (such as Pt, Pd, Ni, Co, Mo, W) to achieve both mild operating conditions and high selectivity, reducing unwanted by-products while maintaining catalyst stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies specific local properties of the catalyst by incorporating metal oxides at controlled concentrations to enhance selectivity for desired olefin products while suppressing by-product formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If carbon nanotube catalyst is used, then olefin yield is improved, but process requires high temperatures and steam addition making it energy intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveolefin yieldVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes operating parameters by conducting catalytic cracking at moderate temperatures (450-650°C) without requiring steam addition, thereby achieving high olefin yield with reduced energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If conventional catalytic cracking is used, then conversion efficiency is improved, but product selectivity is difficult to adjust and control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidproduct selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements process control mechanisms that monitor and adjust operating conditions to optimize product selectivity, using the catalyst composition and reaction parameters as feedback elements to control the distribution of olefin products

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves high selectivity for olefin products, particularly ethylene and propylene, with reduced production of less valued by-products and improved catalyst stability, allowing for efficient conversion at lower temperatures.

Implementation Method 1

contacting a hydrocarbon feed stream with a catalyst in an oxidic form comprising metals M1, M2, M3 and M4

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS10336947B2Process for conversion of a hydrocarbon feed
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 SMH CO LTD

AI summary

The present invention relates to a process for conversion of a hydrocarbon feed comprising saturated hydrocarbon compounds to olefin products comprising contacting a hydrocarbon feed stream with a catalyst in an oxidic form of the formula M1M2M3M4O comprising metals M1, M2, M3 and M4, wherein: M1 is selected from Si, Al, Zr, and mixtures thereof; M2 is selected from Pt, Cr, and mixtures thereof; M3 is selected from W, Mo, Re, and mixtures thereof; and M4 is selected from Sn, K, Y, Yb and mixtures thereof; wherein: mass fraction of M1 is in the range of 0.1 to 0.8; mass fraction of M2 is in the range of 0.001 to 0.2; mass fraction of M3 is in the range of 0.001 to 0.2; mass fraction of M4 is in the range of 0.0001 to 0.2; and mass fraction of oxygen is in the range of 0.1 to 0.8.