One-Pedal Braking Control With Regen and Friction Torque Blending

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In one-pedal driving mode of electric vehicles, the inconsistency in braking performance occurs when the powertrain braking torque capacity is insufficient, leading to varying deceleration rates due to reliance solely on regenerative braking, which is not effectively supplemented by friction brakes in existing systems.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle controller is programmed to command torques from both the powertrain and friction brakes to ensure consistent braking by determining the target braking torque based on the accelerator pedal position, using the powertrain for primary braking and supplementing with friction brakes when the powertrain capacity is inadequate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If regenerative braking alone is used in one-pedal driving mode, then battery charging efficiency is improved, but braking performance consistency deteriorates when powertrain capacity is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery charging efficiencyVSAvoidbraking performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines regenerative braking and friction braking into a unified braking system. The controller dynamically coordinates both braking mechanisms to work together, merging their advantages to achieve both energy recovery and consistent braking performance across all operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary that manages the transition and coordination between regenerative braking and friction braking. It monitors powertrain capacity in real-time and intermediates the braking force distribution, switching between or combining the two braking methods as needed to maintain performance consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If friction brakes are added to supplement powertrain braking, then braking performance consistency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking performance consistencyVSAvoidbraking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The braking system is designed with multi-functionality where the friction brakes serve dual purposes: providing supplemental braking force when powertrain capacity is insufficient and enabling complete stops. The controller universally manages both braking systems through a single coordination logic, reducing operational complexity despite the added hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If controller coordination of multiple braking sources is implemented, then braking performance consistency is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking performance consistencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the braking force distribution between powertrain and friction brakes based on real-time conditions. The controller continuously monitors powertrain capacity, vehicle speed, and braking demand, dynamically optimizing the coordination strategy to maintain performance consistency while adapting to changing operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures consistent braking performance by utilizing the powertrain for primary braking and friction brakes to account for powertrain capacity shortfalls, maintaining consistent deceleration rates and enhancing battery charging efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Many electrified vehicles are capable of regenerative braking to recharge the battery by converting mechanical power into electrical power

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

command torques from the powertrain and the friction brakes such that the target braking torque is satisfied

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11938842B2Vehicle braking controls and methods
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11938842B2 patent drawing
  • US11938842B2 patent drawing
  • US11938842B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes a powertrain having an electric machine configured to power driven wheels, an accelerator pedal, and friction brakes. A vehicle controller is programmed to, with the vehicle being in a one-pedal driving mode: in response to a braking torque capacity of the powertrain exceeding a target braking torque that is based on a position of the accelerator pedal, command a torque, that is equal to the target braking torque, from the powertrain such that the vehicle is slowed using the powertrain without application of the friction brakes, and, in response to the braking torque capacity of the powertrain being less than the target braking torque, command torques from the powertrain and the friction brakes such that the target braking torque is satisfied and the vehicle is slowed using the powertrain and the friction brakes.