Descaling Cell Layout With Opposed Single-Impeller Slurry Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing descaling cell designs are complex, costly to maintain, and inefficient due to multiple impeller wheels, leading to issues like blinding and increased manufacturing and operating costs, while also requiring larger enclosures that complicate manufacturing and installation.

Innovation Solution

A descaling cell design featuring a pair of descaling components with a single motor-driven slurry propelling impeller on each side, aligned in series, which reduces the number of impeller wheels and enclosure size, allowing for a simpler construction, lower manufacturing costs, and improved efficiency by balancing blast patterns and eliminating blinding through optimized slurry and grit management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If multiple impeller wheels are used in existing descaling cell designs, then scale removal capability is maintained, but device complexity and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of impeller wheelsVSAvoidscale removal capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple impeller wheel functions into a single impeller wheel design. The single impeller wheel is configured to propel slurry across the entire width of the sheet metal in a direction transverse to the sheet metal travel direction, integrating the scale removal function that previously required multiple impeller wheels. This merging reduces device complexity while maintaining effective scale removal capability through optimized slurry distribution and blast pattern design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of manufacture

If multiple impeller wheels are used in existing descaling cell designs, then scale removal coverage is improved, but manufacturing costs and enclosure size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidenclosure size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple impeller wheels into a single impeller wheel that spans the width of the sheet metal, reducing the number of components that need to be manufactured and assembled. This single impeller design reduces manufacturing costs while also minimizing the enclosure space required, as it eliminates the need for multiple motor mounts, drive shafts, and supporting structures that would be required for multiple impeller wheels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a configuration with multiple impeller wheels arranged along the sheet metal travel direction to a single impeller wheel that operates in the transverse direction across the sheet metal width. This dimensional change allows the single impeller to cover the entire width of the sheet metal, maintaining scale removal coverage while reducing the longitudinal space required in the enclosure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If multiple impeller wheels are used in existing descaling cell designs, then slurry distribution is achieved, but operating costs and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating costVSAvoidmaintenance requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple impeller wheels into a single impeller wheel design, which directly reduces the number of moving parts, motors, and drive mechanisms. This merging significantly lowers maintenance requirements as there is only one impeller wheel to inspect, maintain, and replace compared to multiple units. Operating costs are reduced due to lower energy consumption from a single motor and reduced maintenance labor and material costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The reduced footprint and simplified design result in lower operating and maintenance costs, improved scale removal efficiency, and a more standard, easier-to-manufacture descaling cell that effectively processes sheet metal with reduced energy consumption and facility installation requirements.

Implementation Method 1

a descaling cell features a pair of descaling components with a single motor-driven slurry propelling impeller on each side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

motor-driven slurry propelling impeller... balanced blast patterns... improved scale removal efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact Force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS12121948B2Descaling cell component and method
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 LLOYDS ENGINEERING WORKS LTD
  • US12121948B2 patent drawing
  • US12121948B2 patent drawing
  • US12121948B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for descaling a sheet of metal include first and second descaling components that each have a single motor driven slurry propelling impeller mounted on a top and bottom of an enclosure. The top and bottom mounted impellers of the first component are configured to propel slurry onto a sheet of metal passing through the enclosure across the entire width of the sheet of metal in a first direction extending from one lateral side to an opposite lateral side of the enclosure. The top and bottom mounted impellers of the second component are configured to propel slurry onto a sheet of metal passing through the enclosure across the entire width of the sheet of metal in a second direction opposite the first direction and extending from the opposite lateral side to the one lateral side of the enclosure.