Optical Sorter Ejector Control for Yield–Quality Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing optical sorters require specialized maintenance engineers to adjust ejector nozzle settings for yield and quality, which is time-consuming and difficult for ordinary users.

Innovation Solution

An optical sorter with multiple ejector nozzles and sorting strength levels, allowing users to easily set operation parameters through a console screen, including ejection period, overlap value, and fault area identification, enabling automatic setting of parameters for different yield and quality requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If compressed air hits on a defective article for a long period of time and in a wide range, then the defective article can be reliably removed, but good articles may be involved in compressed air and removed together resulting in reduced yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefective article removal reliabilityVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The ejector nozzle operation is made dynamic by allowing different operation modes (first operation mode for high yield, second operation mode for high quality) with different compressed air ejection parameters. The system can switch between these modes based on the desired outcome, making the ejection process adaptable rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of compressed air ejection (ejection period, ejection range, timing) to resolve the contradiction. By adjusting these parameters between two operation modes, the system can achieve either high yield or high quality sorting depending on the specific needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If individual ejector nozzle operation parameters are set for high-quality sorting, then defective articles can be reliably removed, but specialized maintenance engineers need to take time to make settings through trial and error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting qualityVSAvoidsetting adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-configuring two complete operation modes (first operation mode and second operation mode) with optimized parameters. This eliminates the need for trial-and-error adjustments during actual operation, as the appropriate mode is already prepared and can be selected directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit automatically manages the switching between operation modes based on simple input from the setting unit. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for specialized maintenance engineers to manually adjust individual parameters, making the system easy to operate for ordinary users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If multiple operation parameters are set for different sorting strengths, then users can easily select desired yield and quality levels, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter setting easeVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit is designed with multi-functionality to manage both the first and second operation modes, as well as handle switching between them. This universal control mechanism simplifies the user interface while managing the complexity internally, allowing ordinary users to easily select operation modes without understanding the underlying complex parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Users can easily adjust the sorter to achieve desired yield and quality without trial and error, improving efficiency and reducing the time required for setting adjustments.

Implementation Method 1

an ejector controller that includes multiple ejector nozzles and is configured to sort out the granular objects into the defective article and the good article by ejecting compressed air to the defective article from the ejector nozzles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressed air ejection: Jet

Data Source

PatentEP4169628B1Optical sorting machine
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 SATAKE CORP
  • EP4169628B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4169628B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4169628B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An optical sorter including: an inspection part that is configured to perform optical inspection on granular objects transferred by transfer means; a judgment part that is configured to judge whether each granular object is a good article or a defective article based on the optical inspection performed by the inspection part; an ejector controller that includes multiple ejector nozzles and is configured to sort out the granular objects into the defective article and the good article by ejecting compressed air to the defective article from the ejector nozzles; and a sorting strength setting part that is capable of setting a sorting strength in the ejector controller, wherein the sorting strength is constituted of multiple sorting strength levels, and the sorting strength setting part is capable of presetting, for each of the sorting strength levels, multiple kinds of operation setting parameters that control an operation of the ejector nozzles.