Optical Stasis Wheel Detection for Coverage Robots

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing coverage robots face challenges in detecting stasis conditions, such as being stuck or losing contact with the surface, which can lead to inaccurate motion detection and potential damage or inefficiency in cleaning tasks.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a stasis indication wheel with reflective portions and a suspension system that allows movement in directions other than rotation, combined with a signal emitter and receiver, enables detection of stasis conditions by monitoring transitions between reflective and non-reflective sections as the wheel rotates and moves, and a drive current monitoring system to determine if the robot is stuck or free-wheeling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a stasis indication wheel with reflective portions and suspension is implemented, then stasis condition detection capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestasis condition detectionVSAvoidwheel assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel is divided into reflective and non-reflective portions, creating distinct segments that can be differentiated by the optical sensor. This segmentation allows the single wheel to provide multiple detection states (moving vs. stasis) without requiring multiple separate sensors or complex mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stasis indication wheel serves multiple functions: it acts as both a motion detection indicator and a stasis condition detector. The same wheel structure with its reflective portions provides information about both wheel rotation and suspension movement, eliminating the need for separate detection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If the suspension permits movement of the wheel in directions other than rotation, then stasis detection accuracy is improved, but mechanical complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestasis detection accuracyVSAvoidsuspension mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suspension is designed to be dynamically responsive, permitting wheel movement in directions other than rotation only when stasis conditions occur. This dynamic behavior allows the system to adapt to different operational states without requiring complex mechanical structures, using the natural compliance of the suspension to provide detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If drive current monitoring is implemented to detect stasis conditions, then detection reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestasis detection reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring drive current and using this information to detect stasis conditions. The controller receives feedback from the optical sensor about wheel motion and cross-references it with drive current data, creating a reliable detection system that only consumes additional energy when detection is needed, rather than continuously operating high-power sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively detects stasis conditions, ensuring accurate motion tracking and preventing damage by allowing the robot to adjust its behavior accordingly, such as avoiding cliffs or obstacles, and maintaining efficient cleaning operations.

Implementation Method 1

A signal emitter is disposed remotely from the wheel and positioned to direct a signal that sequentially is intercepted by the first and second reflective portions of the wheel. A signal receiver is positioned to receive the signal as reflected by the wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS9317038B2Detecting robot stasis
Publication Date: 2016.04.19 IROBOT CORP
  • US9317038B2 patent drawing
  • US9317038B2 patent drawing
  • US9317038B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A coverage robot includes a drive configured to maneuver the robot as directed by a controller, a stasis indication wheel rotatable about a first axis perpendicular to a direction of forward travel, and a suspension supporting the wheel. The stasis indication wheel defines a first reflective portion and a second reflective portion. The second reflective portion is substantially less reflective than the first reflective portion. The suspension permits movement of the wheel in a direction other than rotation about the first axis. A signal emitter is disposed remotely from the wheel and positioned to direct a signal that sequentially is intercepted by the first and second reflective portions of the wheel. A signal receiver is positioned to receive the reflected signal by the rotating wheel. Communication between the emitter and the receiver is affected by rolling transitions between the first and second reflective portions during permitted movement of the wheel.