Optical Switch Driver Timing to Reduce Channel Cross-Talk

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dynamic electrical cross-talk between driver channels in optical switches is significant due to shared electrical supply lines, especially when integrating multiple drivers onto a single chip, making it difficult to compensate using position feedback loops.

Innovation Solution

Implementing staggered switching and high-impedance modes for non-switching drivers during voltage transitions, where switching periods are interleaved with no-switching periods and non-switching drivers are placed in high-impedance mode to isolate channels from cross-talk, effectively reducing average cross-talk voltage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple driver circuits share the same electrical supply and ground lines, then device integration is improved, but electrical cross-talk between channels increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice integrationVSAvoidelectrical cross-talk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the switching operation of multiple driver circuits by introducing staggered switching periods. Instead of all drivers switching simultaneously, they are divided into different time groups where drivers in one group switch while drivers in another group are in high-impedance mode. This temporal segmentation reduces the simultaneous current draw from shared supply lines, thereby reducing electrical cross-talk while maintaining integrated driver architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action by creating alternating switching and non-switching periods for different driver groups. Each driver alternates between active switching periods and high-impedance periods in a staggered pattern. This periodic modulation of current draw from shared supply lines reduces dynamic voltage fluctuations and cross-talk, while still achieving the required positioning control through repeated switching cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Area of stationary object

If drivers are placed close together on a PCB or integrated on a chip, then device compactness is improved, but supply line impedance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compactnessVSAvoidsupply line impedance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the switching operations of closely-placed drivers into staggered time periods, the patent reduces the simultaneous current demand on shared supply lines. This temporal segmentation compensates for the increased impedance caused by compact physical placement, as the reduced peak current demands result in smaller voltage drops across the high-impedance supply lines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic control where drivers transition between low-impedance switching mode and high-impedance standby mode in a time-varying pattern. This dynamic switching strategy adapts the impedance characteristics of individual drivers over time, reducing the overall impact on shared supply lines despite the compact layout that necessitates higher supply line impedance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If position feedback loop bandwidth is limited, then system stability is improved, but cross-talk compensation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidcross-talk compensation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by proactively preventing cross-talk through staggered switching schedules before cross-talk can accumulate and require compensation. By scheduling drivers to switch in alternating periods rather than simultaneously, the system prevents the generation of significant cross-talk voltages in the first place, making feedback compensation unnecessary and preserving system stability within the limited bandwidth constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the limitation of limited feedback bandwidth into a benefit by designing a system that doesn't rely on feedback compensation. The staggered switching strategy transforms the potential harm of limited compensation capability into an advantage by preventing cross-talk through open-loop timing control, thereby achieving cross-talk reduction without requiring high-bandwidth feedback paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces cross-talk between channels while maintaining efficient switching times, even when integrated onto a chip, by managing impedance and sampling previous output values, thus minimizing voltage drops during switching events.

Implementation Method 1

Piezoelectric actuators are used in a large variety of fields where accurate positioning is required

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

In order to reduce the dynamic electrical cross-talk between channel voltages a simple method might be to lower the impedance of the supply feeds and to lower the output impedance of the voltage supply or/and add more decoupling to the voltage supply

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical impedance reduction: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS10382844B2Optical switches and methods of reducing cross-talk
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 HUBERSUHNER POLATIS LTD
  • US10382844B2 patent drawing
  • US10382844B2 patent drawing
  • US10382844B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical switch with a plurality of actuators includes a controller configured to control the operation of a plurality of channels, where each channel has at least one electrical driver and at least one actuator, by interleaving periods of voltage switching output with periods of no voltage switching output for one or more drivers whilst the output voltage is switching from one level to another level. Alternatively, an optical switch with a plurality of actuators comprises a controller configured to control the operation of a plurality of channels, where each channel has at least one electrical driver and at least one actuator, by switching the output voltage from one level to another level for at least one driver of a first channel whilst at least one oilier driver of at least one other channel is in a relatively high impedance mode.