Anti-Fuse OTP Memory Cell Structure for Secure State Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anti-fuse OTP memory devices are not entirely satisfactory in all respects, particularly in terms of their security and reliability in secure key storage and code storage applications.

Innovation Solution

The OTP memory device incorporates a memory array with N-type and P-type memory cells, each having channel layers and gate structures, and a wall structure that enhances the integration and reliability of the anti-fuse gate structure, allowing for secure programming and reading operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If anti-fuse OTP memory cells are programmed once, then the storage state is determined and cannot be modified, but this limitation reduces the adaptability for security applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage state stabilityVSAvoidprogrammability flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The memory array is segmented into multiple memory cells with different types (N-type and P-type) that have distinct programming characteristics. This allows different cells to serve different security functions - some programmed once for stable storage, others programmable multiple times for flexibility, resolving the contradiction between reliability and adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the memory array have different programming properties. N-type memory cells provide one-time programming with high reliability for secure storage, while P-type memory cells provide re-programmability for flexibility. Each region is optimized for its specific security application requirement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If OTP memory cells are designed for secure key storage, then security is improved, but the device complexity increases due to multiple memory cell types and gate structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity vulnerabilityVSAvoidmemory cell structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines N-type and P-type memory cells in a unified memory array with shared word-line gate structures. This merging approach maintains security through diverse cell types while reducing complexity by sharing common infrastructure, achieving both security improvement and complexity control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The word-line gate structures serve multiple functions: programming N-type cells, programming P-type cells, and reading from both types. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated structures, thereby controlling device complexity while maintaining security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12615768B2One-time-programmable memory device
Publication Date: 2026.04.28 EMEMORY TECH INC
  • US12615768B2 patent drawing
  • US12615768B2 patent drawing
  • US12615768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A one-time-programmable (OTP) memory device includes a memory array including an N-type memory cell and a P-type memory cell. The N-type memory cell includes first channel layers and second channel layers. The P-type memory cell includes third channel layers and fourth channel layers. The N-type memory cell and the P-type memory cell further include a first word-line gate structure extending in the Y-direction and wrapping around the first channel layers and the third channel layers, and an anti-fuse gate structure extending in the Y-direction and wrapping around the second channel layers and the fourth channel layers. The OTP memory device further includes a wall structure extending in an X-direction and between the N-type memory cell and the P-type memory cell in the Y-direction. The first channel layers, the second channel layers, the third channel layers, and the fourth channel layers attach on the wall structure.