Oyster Shucking Mechanism With Guided Spike Force Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional oyster shucking methods are slow and hazardous due to manual handling with thin blades, limiting efficiency and safety, particularly in commercial settings where faster oyster opening is desired for increased profitability.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical oyster shucking device featuring a double parabolic roller bearing arrangement, spike, and positioning cylinder that allows for controlled force application and alignment, providing a safe and efficient method to open oysters of varying sizes without manual reconfiguration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual oyster shucking with a thin blade is used, then the device complexity is low, but the productivity is low and safety is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoyster opening rateVSAvoidshucking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical shucking process with an automated mechanical system. A motor drives a spike through a positioning cylinder and roller bearing arrangement to automatically pry open oysters, eliminating the need for manual blade manipulation and significantly increasing opening speed and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a roller bearing as an intermediary element between the motor-driven spike and the oyster. The roller bearing reduces friction and enables smooth, controlled motion of the spike, allowing for efficient force transfer while maintaining precise alignment through the positioning cylinder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual oyster shucking with a thin blade is used, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability (safety) is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidshucking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the dangerous manual blade with an automated mechanical spike system. The motor-driven mechanism eliminates direct human contact with sharp edges, while the positioning cylinder and roller bearing ensure controlled, predictable motion that prevents accidental slips or injuries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The device is designed to hold and position the oyster automatically on the base, with the spike mechanism self-aligning through the positioning cylinder. This self-positioning capability reduces the need for manual handling and intervention, thereby improving safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed spike position is used, then the device complexity is low, but the adaptability to various oyster sizes is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of oyster sizesVSAvoidpositioning mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic positioning system where the spike's vertical position can be adjusted along the positioning cylinder. This allows the device to adapt to different oyster sizes and hinge positions, with the roller bearing maintaining consistent alignment regardless of the spike's position within the cylinder's travel range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device enables quick and consistent opening of oysters with reduced risk of injury, enhancing productivity and safety while accommodating different oyster sizes without manual adjustments.

Implementation Method 1

A double parabolic roller bearing arrangement housed in a bearing box above a spike and positioning cylinder generates an efficient transfer of an actuation force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRoller bearing: Roller

Implementation Method 2

generates an efficient transfer of an actuation force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

the spike and positioning cylinder arrangement provides for consistent and stable alignment of the spike all the way through a stroke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint:

Implementation Method 4

generates an efficient transfer of an actuation force to an oyster hinge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS9462816B2Oyster opening device
Publication Date: 2016.10.11 LEE JR ROBERT
  • US9462816B2 patent drawing
  • US9462816B2 patent drawing
  • US9462816B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is an oyster shucking device, of which both manual and automated embodiments are envisioned. An exemplary embodiment is constructed of aluminum and/or stainless steel and may be mounted on a wooden, steel or plastic base. A double roller bearing arrangement housed in a bearing box above a spike and positioning cylinder generates an efficient transfer of an actuation force to an oyster hinge while providing a user with the ability to adjust the amount of force applied to the oyster. Additionally, the spike and positioning cylinder arrangement provides for consistent and stable alignment of the spike all the way through a stroke. Further, the vertical travel of the spike as guided by the positioning cylinder provides for a wide range of travel by the spike to accommodate various oyster sizes without having to reconfigure or adjust the setup of the device.