Peer-to-Peer Supply Medium Exchange System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing supply medium exchange systems rely on central server structures, which incur high transaction costs and require significant security measures to protect customer data from unauthorized access, leading to increased operational expenses.

Innovation Solution

A peer-to-peer network and application are used to facilitate the supply medium exchange process between mobile units and stations, eliminating the need for a central server by enabling decentralized authorization and transaction processing through a peer-to-peer network, where each node monitors the accuracy of the exchange release message, thereby enhancing security and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a central server structure is used to manage supply medium exchange, then centralized control and coordination are improved, but transaction costs and security measures requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized controlVSAvoidsecurity measures
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized server structure into multiple peer nodes distributed across the network. Each peer runs the application and participates in transaction validation, eliminating the single-point control architecture while maintaining system reliability through distributed consensus mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the central server component from the system architecture entirely. By removing this centralized element, the system transitions to a peer-to-peer model where control and validation functions are distributed among all participating nodes, thereby reducing the security burden on any single entity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If a central server is used to process transactions, then transaction management is simplified, but transaction costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction managementVSAvoidtransaction costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where peer nodes autonomously validate and process transactions without requiring central server intervention. Each node independently verifies transaction validity based on consensus rules, eliminating the need for expensive centralized transaction processing while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes each peer node universal by enabling it to perform multiple functions: storing data, validating transactions, generating blocks, and communicating with other nodes. This multi-functionality distributes the transaction management workload across the entire network, reducing costs associated with centralized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a central platform is used to ensure secure transactions, then transaction security is improved, but system complexity and operational expenses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action through cryptographic hashing and digital signatures that are built into the transaction structure itself. These security measures are embedded in advance within each transaction and block, providing inherent security without requiring complex centralized verification systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through the consensus protocol where nodes continuously monitor and validate each other's actions. The distributed ledger provides real-time feedback on transaction states, and the consensus mechanism adjusts block generation and validation based on network conditions, maintaining security through decentralized feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11305660B2Supply medium exchange system for mobile units
Publication Date: 2022.04.19 INNOGY INNOVATION GMBH
  • US11305660B2 patent drawing
  • US11305660B2 patent drawing
  • US11305660B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are embodiments of a supply medium exchange system. The system includes at least one supply medium exchange station having at least one supply medium exchange interface. It is configured to exchange a supply medium with at least one mobile unit including at least one supply medium storage and at least one first peer-to-peer module assigned to the mobile unit. It is also configured to communicate with at least one peer-to-peer application of at least one peer-to-peer network. The first peer-to-peer module is configured to cause a generation of a supply medium exchange release message for releasing of the exchange of the supply medium between the mobile unit and the supply medium exchange station by means of the peer-to-peer application.