Robotic Picking Training for Optimal Package Grasp Points

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated storage and retrieval systems face inefficiencies in picking packages with varying sizes, weights, and orientations due to suboptimal picking location selection, leading to reduced throughput.

Innovation Solution

A robotic package retrieval system creates and utilizes a database of article models, including 3D and 2D images, and center of gravity data to determine an optimal picking location, allowing for efficient picking of articles regardless of their weight distribution or orientation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional picking methods are used without article models, then the system is simpler to operate, but picking efficiency decreases and throughput is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates and stores article models (including 3D models, 2D images, and center of gravity data) in advance before the actual picking operation. This preliminary action allows the robotic system to quickly determine optimal picking locations without real-time complex calculations, thereby improving picking efficiency while managing system complexity through pre-processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies (models) of physical articles that capture essential geometric and physical properties. These models are stored in a database and used to simulate and determine optimal picking strategies without requiring physical trial-and-error, thus improving productivity while keeping the physical system relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If optimal picking locations are determined using article models, then picking accuracy improves, but the time required for picking increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking location accuracyVSAvoidpicking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex real-time mechanical sensing and trial-and-error physical adjustments with pre-computed digital models and algorithms. The article models containing geometric and center of gravity data allow the system to calculate optimal picking locations through software rather than time-consuming physical experimentation, achieving high precision without excessive time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the state of article information from physical-only to digital-model-based, storing key parameters (dimensions, center of gravity, surface characteristics) in structured formats. This parameter transformation enables rapid computational determination of optimal picking locations, balancing accuracy requirements with time constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system handles articles with varying weight distributions, then adaptability improves, but determining optimal picking locations becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearticle handling capabilityVSAvoidcenter of gravity determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates digital models that include center of gravity information for articles with varying weight distributions. By capturing this physical property in the digital model, the system can adapt to different articles without physical measurement during operation, improving versatility while reducing the difficulty of real-time detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system determines and stores center of gravity data as part of the article model creation process before actual picking operations. This preliminary characterization of weight distribution properties allows the system to adapt to various articles without difficulty during runtime, as all necessary information is pre-captured in the digital models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11065761B2Robotic picking training technique
Publication Date: 2021.07.20 DEMATIC CORP
  • US11065761B2 patent drawing
  • US11065761B2 patent drawing
  • US11065761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of training a robot to pick a plurality of articles includes determining an identity of an article and determining if the article has a uniform distribution of weight. If the article has a uniform distribution of weight, a three-dimensional (3D) model of the article is created and stored in a database record associated with the identity. If the article does not have a uniform distribution of weight, a 3D model is created, two-dimensional (2D) images of each side of the article are created, and a 3D center of gravity of the article is determined. The 3D model, the 2D images, and the 3D center of gravity of the article are stored in a database record associated with the identity of the article.