Packaging Machine Grouping Device Transverse Overlap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing packaging machines face challenges in efficiently forming groups of products with different orientations to achieve high packing density, particularly when products partially overlap, which increases complexity and weight, reducing robot efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A packaging machine with a grouping device featuring a spreader table with adjustable support bars and a method that allows products to be arranged in a multi-row, single-layer group with partial overlap, using a combination of single-row and double-row support bars that can be moved transversely to achieve the desired packing configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If products are arranged in a multi-row, single-layer group with partial overlap to achieve high packing density, then packing density is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacking densityVSAvoidgrouping device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grouping device is segmented into multiple support bars (single-row and double-row) that can be independently positioned. Each support bar handles a specific row of products, allowing complex multi-row overlapping arrangements to be built from simpler modular components rather than requiring a monolithic complex structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support bars are made dynamically adjustable in their transverse positioning. By moving support bars between different transverse positions, the same hardware configuration can create different overlapping patterns and row arrangements, reducing the need for multiple fixed complex structures for different packing configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If support bars are made adjustable in transverse position to enable different packing configurations, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacking configuration flexibilityVSAvoidadjustable support bar mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each support bar is designed as a universal component that can serve multiple functions: holding single rows of products, being positioned at different transverse locations, and working in combination with other support bars to create various multi-row configurations. This multi-functionality reduces the need for specialized components for each configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves adaptability by changing the transverse position parameter of support bars rather than changing the physical structure. By adjusting the position parameter of existing support bars, different packing configurations are achieved without adding structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If a spreader table with multiple drives is used to adjust transverse spacing of support bars, then grouping flexibility is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransverse spacing adjustmentVSAvoidspreader table weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The drive system is segmented so that each support bar has its own independent drive mechanism. This segmentation allows for distributed weight and simplifies the overall drive architecture compared to a centralized multi-drive system, making each individual drive component lighter while maintaining collective functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If the number of drives in the spreader table is increased to enable precise positioning, then positioning precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransverse position precisionVSAvoidnumber of drives
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multiple independent drives on support bars, where each drive provides sufficient positioning capability for its specific support bar. This partial redundancy ensures that precise positioning is achieved for each component independently, and the system can function with partial drive operation if needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4276021B1Packaging machine with grouping device and method for creating single-ply groups of products that partially overlap one another
Publication Date: 2025.06.18 GERHARD SCHUBERT GMBH
  • EP4276021B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4276021B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP4276021B1 patent drawingFigure 1b

AI summary

The packaging machine according to the invention can not only produce two-dimensional groups on the spreading tables from products fed in a normal, upright position, with products alternating in both directions, upright and upside down, inverted, products, which are in particular each mounted on a rail-guided carriage, but these, for example, eight rows of seats on the spreading table, which are distributed on six support rails, can be selectively moved in the stationary spreading station into discharge sets of products with two, three or four rows by means of the spreading table, wherein the rows of a discharge set are located at an overlap distance from each other, in that the products resting on these seats overlap each other in the transverse direction, but a non-overlap distance is maintained between the discharge sets in the transverse direction in order to, for example,to be able to transfer two removal sets one after the other into boxes using the same removal robot on a spreading table.