Parallel Semiconductor Module Layout for Inductance-Balanced Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing semiconductor modules experience current imbalance due to differences in self-inductance and parasitic inductance between switching elements connected in parallel, leading to unbalanced gate voltages during switching operations.

Innovation Solution

The semiconductor module is designed with a configuration where the self-inductance and mutual inductance of current paths are optimized to ensure equal inductance sums for each switching element, achieved by strategically positioning the main terminals and heat sinks, thereby balancing the gate voltage and current flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If multiple switching elements are connected in parallel and driven by one driver, then the current handling capability is improved, but the current imbalance occurs due to differences in self-inductance and parasitic inductance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent handling capabilityVSAvoidcurrent balance
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by intentionally designing different current path layouts for each switching element. Specifically, the first current path and second current path are arranged asymmetrically with respect to the first and second switching elements, respectively. This asymmetric arrangement ensures that the sum of self-inductance and mutual inductance is equalized for both switching elements, thereby balancing the gate voltages and currents despite the parallel connection configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of operation

If main terminals are horizontally arranged along the alignment direction of switching elements, then the connection simplicity is improved, but the self-inductance difference between current paths increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection simplicityVSAvoidself-inductance uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by optimizing the specific arrangement of current paths and heat sinks in different regions of the module. The first current path is arranged with a first heat sink, and the second current path is arranged with a second heat sink, creating locally optimized current paths. This local optimization ensures that despite the horizontal arrangement of main terminals for connection simplicity, the self-inductance and mutual inductance sums are equalized, achieving uniform inductance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Area of stationary object

If switching elements are disposed side by side, then the module compactness is improved, but the parasitic inductance difference occurs leading to gate voltage imbalance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule compactnessVSAvoidgate voltage balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by considering the three-dimensional arrangement of current paths and heat sinks. The first and second heat sinks are disposed at different positions and orientations, and the current paths are routed through different spatial dimensions. This three-dimensional optimization allows the switching elements to be disposed side by side for compactness while equalizing the sum of self-inductance and mutual inductance, thereby maintaining gate voltage balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration effectively restricts current imbalance and ensures balanced gate voltages across switching elements during switching operations, enhancing the performance and reliability of the semiconductor module.

Implementation Method 1

a difference occurs in a self-inductance of a current path provided between the second main electrode (for example, the emitter electrode) and the second main terminal (for example, the emitter terminal)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-inductance: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the self-inductance and mutual inductance of current paths are optimized to ensure equal inductance sums for each switching element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMutual inductance: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP3660899B1Semiconductor module
Publication Date: 2024.11.20 DENSO CORP
  • EP3660899B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3660899B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3660899B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

In a semiconductor module (10), multiple switching elements (12, 13, 34) are connected in parallel with each other. A first current path (25, 26) is formed between each of first main electrodes (14b) and a first main terminal (21), and a second current path (27, 28) is formed between each of second main electrodes and a second main terminal (22). When a self-inductance of an arbitrary current path, which is the second current path of any of the switching elements is denoted as Lsn, a mutual inductance of the arbitrary current path and other current paths except for the arbitrary current path is denoted as Mn, and a sum of Lsn and Mn is denoted as Ln, the switching elements and the current paths are disposed in such a manner that Ln of each of the switching elements is equal to each other.