Parallel Test System for Semiconductor Die Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing complexity of semiconductor dies due to higher circuit density leads to a significant increase in the time required for testing, as traditional sequential testing methods become inefficient with the growing number of tests needed to ensure correct functionality.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for performing concurrent testing by defining channel-independent test groups, where total-independence test groups are executed simultaneously and BUT-conflict test groups are performed in an overlapping manner, allowing multiple tests to be conducted without conflicting with each other.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sequential testing methods are used to ensure correct functionality, then testing completeness is improved, but testing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting completenessVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the testing process into multiple independent test groups that can be executed concurrently. Tests are divided into channel-independent groups where each group contains tests that do not conflict with each other for resource usage, allowing parallel execution while maintaining testing completeness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from sequential (one-dimensional) testing to parallel/concurrent (multi-dimensional) testing by executing multiple test groups simultaneously across different channels and blocks, fundamentally changing the testing paradigm from time-sequential to space-parallel execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the number of tests is increased to cover higher circuit density, then testing coverage is improved, but testing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting coverageVSAvoidtesting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large number of tests into organized groups based on channel independence and block-under-test relationships. This segmentation reduces testing complexity by providing a structured approach to managing and executing numerous tests through hierarchical grouping and concurrent execution strategies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the execution parameter from sequential to concurrent/parallel, fundamentally altering how tests are performed. By modifying the execution mode parameter, the system can handle increased testing coverage requirements without proportionally increasing testing complexity or time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7810001B2Parallel test system
Publication Date: 2010.10.05 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US7810001B2 patent drawing
  • US7810001B2 patent drawing
  • US7810001B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a system for defining groups of tests that may be concurrently performed or overlapped are provided. Channel-independent test groups are determined such that each group includes tests that the input/output channels may be utilized simultaneously without conflicts. The channel-independent test groups are divided into block-under-test (BUT) conflict test groups and total-independence test groups. The total-independence test groups may be performed concurrently. Performance of the BUT-conflict test groups may be overlapped such that the input/output channels are used concurrently, but the execution of the tests by the blocks of the device-under-test (DUT) is performed sequentially.