Electric Park Lock Actuator with Rooster Comb Detent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic park lock actuators for vehicles are costly due to the need for larger motors with lower cogging torque and lower gear ratios, and they fail to effectively integrate with existing mechanical systems like the rooster comb, leading to reduced accuracy and increased complexity.

Innovation Solution

An electronic park lock actuator design utilizing a smaller motor with a higher gear ratio, incorporating a two-part actuator with an integrated pin and slot mechanism that limits back drivability and integrates with a spring-loaded rooster comb to achieve precise position holding and reduced mechanical and software complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a larger motor with lower gear ratio is used, then position control accuracy is improved, but device cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition control accuracyVSAvoidactuator complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a large motor with low gear ratio to achieve position accuracy, the patent inverts the approach by using a small motor with high gear ratio and limiting the output rotation to precisely the amount needed to engage the park detent. This inversion allows achieving position control accuracy through mechanical constraint rather than motor size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator is divided into two functional parts: a small motor assembly for generating torque and a separate mechanism (rooster comb with detents) for position control. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently - the motor for compactness and the mechanical linkage for precision positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If a smaller motor with higher gear ratio is used, then device cost is reduced, but position control accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidposition control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

A mechanical intermediary system (the rooster comb with multiple detents and the follower mechanism) is introduced between the small motor and the final output. This intermediary translates the limited motor rotation into precise position control by engaging with the transmission output shaft through the detent mechanism, thereby achieving accuracy without requiring a large motor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If back drivability is allowed, then operational flexibility is improved, but theft deterrence and position holding deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidtheft deterrence
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the back-drivability function from the system by designing a one-way mechanical linkage. The follower and detent mechanism allow motion in only one direction (from motor to transmission), preventing reverse driving while maintaining operational flexibility for the intended shifting operations. This extraction of the bidirectional capability resolves the contradiction between flexibility and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If mechanical linkages are used for position control, then adaptability to existing systems is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration with existing systemsVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical linkage design (rooster comb with multiple detents) is made universal by incorporating multiple engagement positions that can accommodate different transmission configurations. The same mechanism serves both as the position control element and as the interface with existing transmission systems, thereby reducing overall system complexity despite the mechanical nature of the solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables efficient operation with a smaller motor, reduces design complexity, and enhances theft deterrence by limiting back drivability, while maintaining accurate position control and reducing motor peak current.

Implementation Method 1

A spring-loaded follower falls into these detents to identify the gear position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

an electric motor, a worm gear, the worm gear operable for being driven by the electric motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWorm drive: Worm Drive

Data Source

PatentUS11473678B2Electric park lock actuator limited rotary disconnect
Publication Date: 2022.10.18 VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES USA LLC
  • US11473678B2 patent drawing
  • US11473678B2 patent drawing
  • US11473678B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic parking pawl actuator which uses a smaller motor and higher gear ratio has the ability to configure a rooster comb to engage with various park detents, and reduces the mechanical and software design complexity. Furthermore, the electronic park actuator limits the amount of back drivable range (unable to perform an external park to neutral shift) for theft deterrence, and also allows operation (speed performance) and a lower motor peak current. The electronic parking pawl actuator includes an electric motor, a drive gear, the drive gear operable for being driven by the electric motor, and a drive mechanism, the drive mechanism is operable for being driven by the drive gear. The drive mechanism is engaged with an output shaft of a gear selector of a transmission, and the drive mechanism is rotatable relative to the drive gear, allowing the output shaft to be located in a desired position.