Parking Tail Rotor for Compound Aircraft Drag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing compound aircraft designs suffer from significant parasitic drag and energy consumption due to continuously rotating tail rotors at high forward speeds, which reduces aircraft efficiency and power availability.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a parking tail rotor system with two single-bladed rotors that rotate in the same direction, oriented horizontally and balanced by counterweights, which passively stop and orient in the aft direction at high speeds to minimize drag, and restart to balance main rotor torque as needed, using either a common drive shaft or individual electric motors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the tail rotor continues to rotate at high forward speeds to balance main rotor torque, then control authority is maintained, but parasitic drag and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol authorityVSAvoidparasitic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The tail rotor system transitions dynamically between two states: rotating to balance main rotor torque at low speeds, and stopping to reduce drag at high speeds. The system adapts its operational state based on aircraft speed and control requirements, allowing the tail rotor blades to be powered down and stop at high forward speeds when the rudder provides adequate control authority

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter of tail rotor rotation from continuous to conditional based on aircraft speed. At high forward speeds when the rudder has adequate authority, the tail rotor parameter changes from rotating to stopped, eliminating parasitic drag while maintaining control capability through the rudder

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the tail rotor continues to rotate at high forward speeds, then torque balance is maintained, but power consumption increases reducing available power for other uses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque balanceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the torque balancing function from the tail rotor at high speeds and transfers it to the rudder. When the aircraft reaches high forward speeds, the rudder provides adequate control authority to balance the remaining main rotor torque, allowing the tail rotor to be powered down and stop, thereby eliminating unnecessary power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If a single tail rotor with two blades is used, then the structure is simpler, but the disc area is smaller resulting in higher disc loading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor structureVSAvoiddisc loading
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The tail rotor is segmented into two separate single-bladed rotors disposed at opposing ends of the horizontal stabilizer. This segmentation increases the effective disc area compared to a single two-bladed rotor, reducing disc loading while maintaining structural simplicity and achieving the same force output

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly reduces parasitic drag and energy consumption by eliminating the need for continuous tail rotor operation at high speeds, while maintaining control authority and stability through variable or fixed-pitch blades and flapping hinges, enhancing aircraft efficiency and power management.

Implementation Method 1

Each of the two blades has a counterweight integral with the spar of the blade, with the blade disposed on one side of the tail rotor axis of rotation and the counterweight disposed on the opposite side of the tail rotor axis of rotation. The purpose of the counterweights is to balance the weight of each rotor blade to reduce vibration normal to the axis of rotation.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

At high forward speeds, the tail rotor blades stop and passively park in the downwind direction to reduce parasitic drag. With increased speed, the force of the relative wind on the tail rotor blades passively rotates the blades until both blades are in a parked position with the two rotor blades extended in the aft direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the fuselage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS11866163B1Low-drag tail rotor for a compound aircraft
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 PIASECKI AIRCRAFT CORP
  • US11866163B1 patent drawing
  • US11866163B1 patent drawing
  • US11866163B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A parking tail rotor for a rotary wing aircraft stops rotating at a high forward aircraft speed when aircraft control surfaces have adequate control authority to balance main rotor torque without the rotating tail rotor. When stopped, the blades of the parking tail rotor move due to the force of the relative wind to a parked position in which the span of the blades extend in the aft direction, reducing air resistance to the forward motion of the aircraft.