Path Risk Evaluating Apparatus for Secondary Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In complex environments like households, industrial robots face challenges in avoiding collisions with objects due to low position recognition accuracy, unstable control, and high-speed movement demands, leading to potential damage from secondary collisions when moving or grasping objects.

Innovation Solution

A path risk evaluating apparatus that assesses the likelihood of secondary collisions and damage by evaluating the movement path of a mobile device, considering object positions and attributes, to select paths with low damage risk and adjust movement speeds accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the robot moves at high speed to complete tasks efficiently, then productivity is improved, but the risk of collision with objects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution speedVSAvoidcollision avoidance capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary risk evaluation of movement paths before the robot executes motion. By calculating collision risk in advance based on object positions, movement parameters, and environmental factors, the system can select safe high-speed paths or adjust trajectories to avoid collisions, enabling fast motion without compromising safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors object positions and robot state, then feeds this information back to the risk evaluation module. This real-time feedback allows dynamic adjustment of movement paths and speeds, enabling the robot to maintain high productivity while adapting to changing environmental conditions that may increase collision risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If the robot moves at high speed, then task completion time is reduced, but the damage from secondary collisions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion timeVSAvoiddamage from secondary collision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The risk evaluation system assesses potential secondary collision risks before the robot moves. By identifying paths where objects might be displaced and cause secondary collisions, the system can select alternative routes or adjust speeds in advance, preventing damage while maintaining efficient task completion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The risk evaluation apparatus acts as an intermediary between the motion planning system and the physical environment. It mediates by filtering out high-risk paths and recommending safe trajectories, thus protecting objects from damage while allowing the robot to move efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If position sensors are added to improve positioning accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject position recognition accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses existing sensors (cameras, LIDAR, or simple position sensors) for multiple purposes: not only for basic navigation but also for precise object position recognition and collision risk evaluation. By making the sensor system multi-functional, additional positioning capability is achieved without adding dedicated sensors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of adding physical sensors, the system creates virtual models or copies of the environment using data from existing sensors. These virtual representations are then used for precise position recognition and risk evaluation, achieving high measurement precision through software processing rather than hardware addition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS7844398B2Path risk evaluating apparatus
Publication Date: 2010.11.30 PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP
  • US7844398B2 patent drawing
  • US7844398B2 patent drawing
  • US7844398B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A path risk evaluating apparatus includes a secondary collision likelihood direction evaluating unit (108) and a secondary collision likelihood distance evaluating unit (109) which evaluate, based on the relationship between a movement path and a position of objects in an environment where a mobile device moves, the likelihood of the mobile device having primary collision with a first object and the first object further having secondary collision with a second object; a risky attribute combination evaluating unit (112) which determines degree of damage when secondary collision occurs, by referring to information, indicating degree of damage when objects in the environment collide, held by a risky attribute combination information holding unit (111); and a path evaluating unit (113) which evaluates the risk of the moving path for the mobile device, based on the evaluation result from the secondary collision likelihood direction evaluating unit (108) and the secondary collision likelihood distance evaluating unit (109) and the degree of damage determined by the risky attribute combination evaluating unit (112).