Patterned Flexible Substrate Strain Relief for Stretchable Electronics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies for flexible and stretchable electronics face challenges in accommodating macroscopic strain without mechanical failure, as existing solutions either introduce manufacturing complexities or are prone to failure under deformation, and fail to support circuit complexities comparable to rigid and rigid-flex electronics.

Innovation Solution

A flexible and stretchable patterned substrate with strain-relief features, such as pores, slots, and areas of reduced thickness, allows for local strain domains lower than macroscopic strain, reducing stress and enabling the substrate to accommodate large deformations while maintaining circuit integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid printed circuit boards are used to support electronic components, then mechanical strength and stability are improved, but flexibility and stretchability are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidflexibility and stretchability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces rigid printed circuit boards with flexible substrates that can be stretched and deformed. The substrate is designed with a patterned conformation including strain relief features that allow the electronic device to conform to flexible surfaces while maintaining structural integrity and supporting electronic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate is divided into multiple regions with different mechanical properties: strain relief regions that can deform and strain-permitting regions that maintain stability. This segmentation allows different parts of the substrate to perform different functions - some areas stretch while others maintain rigidity to support components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If flexible substrates are used to enable stretchability, then adaptability is improved, but mechanical strength and reliability under strain are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestretchabilityVSAvoidmechanical failure resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is segmented into strain relief regions and strain-permitting regions. The strain relief regions are designed to deform and absorb mechanical stress, while the strain-permitting regions maintain structural integrity to support electronic components, preventing mechanical failure during stretching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the substrate are assigned different mechanical properties. The strain relief regions have higher flexibility and lower stiffness to accommodate deformation, while the strain-permitting regions have higher stiffness and strength to reliably support electronic components during stretching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If strain relief features are added to the substrate, then local strain is reduced protecting components, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent protectionVSAvoidsubstrate structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The strain relief features are implemented as a porous or patterned structure within the substrate. This porous design allows the substrate to deform in a controlled manner, creating low strain domains that protect electronic components while maintaining overall substrate integrity and avoiding excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

4Manufacturing precision

If conventional rigid manufacturing processes are used, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but flexibility and conformability of the final device are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit fabrication accuracyVSAvoiddevice conformability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses flexible substrates that can be manufactured using conventional rigid PCB techniques, then stretched and deformed after manufacturing. This allows precise circuit fabrication on flexible material, combining manufacturing precision with device conformability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate is manufactured in a relaxed state with precise circuits using conventional processes, then stretched and deformed after manufacturing to achieve the final flexible configuration. This preliminary manufacturing approach ensures precision is maintained while enabling subsequent flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The substrate design enables the creation of flexible and conformable devices that can withstand significant macroscopic strain without compromising circuit performance, facilitating the integration of electronic components and interconnects while being compatible with conventional industrial manufacturing processes.

Implementation Method 1

A flexible and stretchable patterned substrate with strain-relief features, such as pores, slots, and areas of reduced thickness, allows for local strain domains lower than macroscopic strain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8883287B2Structured material substrates for flexible, stretchable electronics
Publication Date: 2014.11.11 INFINITE CORRIDOR TECH
  • US8883287B2 patent drawing
  • US8883287B2 patent drawing
  • US8883287B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flexible and stretchable patterned substrate is provided having a strain-permitting material comprising a patterned conformation that allows the flexible patterned substrate to experience local strain or local strain domains lower than the macroscopic strain of the flexible and stretchable patterned substrate.