Payment Routing System Using Scaled Settlement Scores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing payment systems often result in suboptimal payment processing and higher costs due to predetermined merchant settings, leading to failed transactions and inefficient routing methods.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses processors and transceivers to receive payment transaction messages, generate scaled scores based on historical data, and apply contribution rules to optimize payment routing according to the likelihood of settlement, allowing for real-time adjustments and feedback-driven algorithm retraining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If predetermined merchant settings are used for payment routing, then the system is simple to operate, but payment processing efficiency deteriorates and settlement success rates decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment routing operationVSAvoidpayment processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs payment routing optimization without requiring merchant intervention. The payment processing system self-adjusts routing decisions based on real-time account data analysis, scaled score generation, and settlement likelihood predictions, eliminating the need for merchants to manually configure routing settings while maximizing processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes routing parameters based on real-time analysis of account data, transaction patterns, and settlement probabilities. Instead of using fixed predetermined settings, the system adjusts routing decisions by modifying parameters such as selected account, payment network, and processing timing based on calculated scaled scores and settlement likelihood

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If predetermined merchant settings are used for payment routing, then device complexity is reduced, but settlement success rates worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment routing systemVSAvoidsettlement success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where settlement outcomes are monitored and used to refine future routing decisions. The payment processing system analyzes actual settlement results, updates account data and transaction patterns, and adjusts scaled score calculations accordingly, creating a self-improving mechanism that increases settlement success rates without increasing apparent system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of account data, transaction patterns, and settlement probabilities before making routing decisions. By pre-calculating scaled scores and predicting settlement likelihood for different routing options, the system ensures optimal routing choices are made in advance, maximizing settlement success rates while maintaining straightforward operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If dynamic scaled score algorithms are implemented for payment routing, then payment processing efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment processing efficiencyVSAvoidpayment routing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex routing decision-making process is segmented into distinct functional modules: account data collection, transaction pattern analysis, scaled score calculation, settlement likelihood prediction, and routing decision execution. Each module handles a specific aspect of the process, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable while achieving high processing efficiency through specialized optimization in each segment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The payment processing system acts as an intermediary layer between the merchant and the multiple payment accounts/networks. This intermediary automatically manages the complexity of analyzing account data across multiple financial institutions, calculating scaled scores, and determining optimal routing, shielding merchants from complexity while delivering efficient payment processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If multiple accounts across multiple financial institutions are analyzed, then settlement success rates are improved, but loss of time increases due to data processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesettlement success rateVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary collection and preliminary analysis of account data from multiple financial institutions before transactions occur. By pre-processing and storing relevant account information, transaction patterns, and settlement characteristics, the system reduces the time required during actual transaction processing while maintaining comprehensive analysis across multiple accounts for high settlement success rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240013188A1Computer-implemented systems and methods for payment routing
Publication Date: 2024.01.11 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US20240013188A1 patent drawing
  • US20240013188A1 patent drawing
  • US20240013188A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for payment routing programmed to: receive a payment transaction message relating to a putative payment transaction of an accountholder, the payment transaction message containing putative payment transaction data including a transaction amount corresponding to the putative payment transaction; identify a plurality of accounts corresponding to the accountholder based on the payment transaction message; implement a payment split among the accounts, the payment split assigning a proportion of the transaction amount to each of the accounts; and generate a scaled score representing the likelihood of settlement of the assigned proportion of the transaction amount via each of the accounts on a date.