Pesticide Robot Obstacle Avoidance With Real-Time Path Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pesticide application robots face challenges in obstacle avoidance, particularly under complex topographic conditions, with limited sensor capabilities and reliance on pre-stored maps, leading to reduced efficiency and the need for human assistance.

Innovation Solution

An automatic obstacle avoidance method for pesticide application robots using machine vision and path planning algorithms like D* to generate optimal paths, combined with real-time environmental perception to update obstacle information and correct paths, ensuring accurate pesticide application without collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional ultrasonic or infrared sensors are used for obstacle detection, then the system structure is simple, but the obstacle avoidance efficiency and accuracy are low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle avoidance efficiencyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple types of sensors (ultrasonic, infrared, camera) into an integrated sensing system that works together to detect obstacles and generate path planning information, thereby improving obstacle avoidance efficiency while distributing system complexity across multiple specialized components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system is designed to perform multiple functions: ultrasonic sensors detect proximity obstacles, infrared sensors detect thermal signatures, and camera systems capture visual information for map building and real-time path planning, allowing a single integrated system to handle diverse obstacle detection tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If pre-stored maps are used for path planning, then the initial path can be planned, but the map cannot be updated in real time leading to outdated navigation information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath planning accuracyVSAvoidmap update time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where sensors continuously detect environmental changes and obstacles, this information is fed back to the path planning module which then updates the robot's navigation path in real time, ensuring the map reflects current conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The path planning system transitions from static pre-stored maps to dynamic real-time map building and updating, allowing the navigation information to adapt continuously to changing environmental conditions and new obstacle discoveries during robot operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If a single obstacle avoidance scheme is used, then the system is simple to implement, but it cannot handle complex topographic conditions effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle avoidance adaptabilityVSAvoidobstacle avoidance system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The obstacle avoidance system is segmented into multiple independent modules: ultrasonic detection module, infrared detection module, camera vision module, and path planning module. Each module handles specific aspects of obstacle detection and avoidance, allowing the system to adapt to different obstacle types while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a composite approach by integrating multiple sensing technologies (ultrasonic, infrared, visual) and multiple path planning algorithms (D*, A*) into a unified obstacle avoidance system, combining the strengths of different methods to handle diverse and complex topographic conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of operation

If manual assistance is required for obstacle avoidance, then the robot can achieve obstacle avoidance, but pesticide application efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle avoidance autonomyVSAvoidpesticide application efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot is equipped with autonomous obstacle avoidance capabilities through integrated sensors and path planning algorithms that enable it to independently detect obstacles, calculate alternative paths, and navigate around obstacles without human intervention, thereby maintaining continuous pesticide application operations and improving overall efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12588670B2Automatic obstacle avoidance method and system of pesticide application robot and storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 TOBACCO RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES (QINGZHOU TOBACCO RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CHINA NATIONAL TOBACCO COMPANY)
  • US12588670B2 patent drawing
  • US12588670B2 patent drawing
  • US12588670B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are an automatic obstacle avoidance method and system of a pesticide application robot and a storage medium. The method includes: acquiring a plan view of a target pesticide application operation area and acquiring path information; acquiring start point information and end point information of a pesticide application robot and environmental information of the target pesticide application operation area, performing preliminary path planning, and acquiring an optimal path; causing the pesticide application robot to arrive at a specified operating point along the optimal path, and performing environmental perception by machine vision, determining obstacle point information and updating the plan view of the target pesticide application operation area with the obstacle point information; and correcting the optimal path with a current location of the pesticide application robot and an area to which a pesticide has been sprayed based on the updated plan view of the target pesticide application operation area.