Photomask Defect Tracking Across Multiple Inspections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current photomask inspection systems face challenges in accurately tracking and comparing defects across multiple inspections from various brands and models, due to different reference points and orientations, leading to inefficient defect management and data handling.

Innovation Solution

A method that translates inspection reports into a common set of fields and populates a relational database, allowing for the comparison and tracking of defects across different inspection systems, independent of coordinate systems, rotations, and orientations, using a unique identifier to link reports from various inspection tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple inspection systems from different brands are used to inspect photomasks, then inspection coverage and detection capability are improved, but defect tracking and comparison become complex due to different reference points and orientations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoiddefect tracking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary coordinate transformation system that acts as a mediator between different inspection systems. The system transforms defect coordinates from various inspection systems' reference frames into a common reference frame, enabling consistent defect tracking across multiple inspections without requiring changes to the inspection systems themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation of defect locations by transforming coordinates from different reference systems into a unified reference system. This involves adjusting positional parameters (X, Y coordinates) and orientation parameters to ensure consistency across multiple inspection reports from different systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If manual defect classification is performed for each inspection report, then defect understanding is improved, but operator time and processing efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect classification knowledgeVSAvoidoperator time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary defect classification during the initial inspection, and the classification results are stored and reused in subsequent inspections. This preliminary action eliminates the need for operators to re-classify the same defects in repeated inspections, significantly reducing operator time while preserving defect classification knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by storing defect classification results from previous inspections and using them to inform subsequent inspections. The classification knowledge is fed back into the inspection process, allowing the system to automatically recognize and categorize recurring defects without requiring fresh manual classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If defect coordinates are reported with respect to different reference points in different inspections, then flexibility in inspection setup is improved, but defect location accuracy and comparability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection setup flexibilityVSAvoiddefect location accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a coordinate transformation intermediary that converts defect coordinates from various reference points into a common reference frame. This intermediary maintains the flexibility of using different reference points in different inspections while ensuring accurate defect location comparability through mathematical transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by creating a reference frame transformation capability that works with any inspection setup. The same system can handle inspections with different reference points, orientations, and configurations, transforming them all into a common framework for accurate defect location comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9557169B2Method for tracking defects on a photomask across repeated inspections
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 RETICLE LABS LLC
  • US9557169B2 patent drawing
  • US9557169B2 patent drawing
  • US9557169B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention allows tracking of a defect across multiple inspections. The inventive solution translates every inspection record into a common set of fields that are first archived into a relational database. Then the defect coordinates from the inspection records of the same mask are all transformed into a common reference frame having the same origin and orientation with respect to the mask coordinate system. Following this, the defect having coordinates within a given tolerance distance are paired up and reported to the user.