Pipe Elbow Manufacturing via Segmented Machining and Welding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing larger diameter pipe fittings are costly due to the need for large molding machines and molds, and economies of scale are low, making them inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A method involving cutting and machining polyethylene pipe stock to form pipe elbows with specific arcuate interior and exterior surfaces, allowing for welding and assembly of fittings that maintain the original pipe's outer diameter surface, enabling efficient production of high-pressure capable fittings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If large molding machines and molds are used to manufacture large diameter pipe fittings, then the fittings can be produced, but the manufacturing cost becomes relatively expensive and economies of scale are low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoideconomies of scale
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The pipe fitting is segmented into multiple sections that can be manufactured separately using standard-sized molding machines and then assembled together. This allows the use of smaller, more economical molding equipment while still producing large diameter fittings, thereby reducing manufacturing costs and improving economies of scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple pipe fitting sections are nested or joined together to form the complete large diameter fitting. The sections can be manufactured independently using standard equipment and then assembled through welding or other joining methods, eliminating the need for expensive large-capacity molding machines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of manufacture

If pipe fittings are assembled from cut and machined pipe stock, then manufacturing cost may be reduced, but the process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidassembly process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pipe sections are pre-formed using molding machines to create near-final shapes with minimal material removal required. This preliminary forming action reduces the complexity of subsequent machining and assembly operations compared to starting with solid pipe stock that requires extensive cutting and shaping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing process changes from mechanical cutting and machining of pipe stock to a combination of molding and minimal finishing operations. This parameter change in the manufacturing approach reduces both cost and process complexity by utilizing material forming rather than material removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10436370B2Pipe elbows and methods of manufacture
Publication Date: 2019.10.08 GEORG FISCHER CENTRAL PLASTICS LLC
  • US10436370B2 patent drawing
  • US10436370B2 patent drawing
  • US10436370B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pipe elbow has a first end and a second end off parallel to the first end. An interior surface of the pipe elbow has a centerline having an arcuate portion. A circular cylindrical exterior surface portion of the pipe elbow surrounds the arcuate portion of the centerline.