Piston Stroke Sensor for Railway Brake Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Railway vehicle brake unit inspections are challenging due to the difficulty in visually verifying brake pad-to-disc contact, especially for in-board disc brake units, requiring operators to access hard-to-reach areas and rely on manual visual checks, which can be inefficient and error-prone.

Innovation Solution

A piston stroke sensor arrangement using a proximity sensor, such as an inductive proximity sensor, is integrated into the brake unit to detect the position of the piston tube, providing electronic signals indicating whether the brake unit is applied or released, and including an air pressure indicator to monitor pressure levels, allowing for remote monitoring and identification of over-stroke conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual visual inspection is used to verify brake pad-to-disc contact, then the inspection method is simple and requires no additional devices, but the operator cannot easily access in-board brake units and inspection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility to brake unitsVSAvoidinspection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with an electronic sensor system. A proximity sensor detects the position of the piston tube to determine brake application status, substituting human visual verification with automated electronic detection. This resolves the contradiction by providing accurate brake status detection without requiring operator access to difficult-to-reach in-board locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If operators physically access in-board brake units for inspection, then direct observation is possible, but inspection time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification capabilityVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The brake unit performs self-verification through the proximity sensor that automatically detects piston position and communicates brake application status to the operator panel. The system verifies its own operational state without requiring external manual inspection, thereby maintaining reliability while eliminating time-consuming physical access requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The proximity sensor provides continuous feedback about piston position to the control system and operator panel. This feedback mechanism automatically informs operators of brake application status, eliminating the need for manual verification and significantly reducing inspection time while maintaining accurate verification capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If electronic sensors are installed in the brake unit, then remote monitoring capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote monitoring capabilityVSAvoidsensor integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The proximity sensor serves multiple functions: detecting piston position, determining brake application status, and providing input to the notification device. By using a single sensor component for multiple detection purposes, the system achieves remote monitoring capability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The notification device acts as an intermediary between the proximity sensor and the operator. It receives sensor signals and presents processed information (brake applied/not applied) on the operator panel, simplifying the interface between the sensor system and human operators while enabling remote monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables remote and accurate monitoring of brake unit operation, eliminating the need for physical access and reducing inspection time, while promptly identifying over-stroke conditions for timely maintenance, enhancing safety and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The proximity sensor may be an inductive proximity sensor. A groove may be defined in an outer circumferential surface of the piston tube. When the brake unit is in a non-applied position, the proximity sensor may detect metal of the piston tube.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInductive proximity sensing: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9616875B2Piston stroke sensor arrangement for a brake unit
Publication Date: 2017.04.11 WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECH CORP
  • US9616875B2 patent drawing
  • US9616875B2 patent drawing
  • US9616875B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A piston stroke sensor arrangement for a brake unit includes a brake unit including a piston and a piston tube, and a proximity sensor supported on the brake unit. The proximity sensor may determine the location of the piston within the brake unit based on the position of the piston tube relative to the proximity sensor. The proximity sensor may be an inductive proximity sensor. A groove may be defined in an outer circumferential surface of the piston tube. When the brake unit is in a non-applied position, the proximity sensor may detect metal of the piston tube. When the brake unit is in an applied position, the proximity sensor may not detect the metal of the piston tube.