Pivotable Plate Meat Removing Device for Irregular Bone Deboning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for deboning carcass leg parts of four-legged slaughter animals, particularly those with irregular profiles like the humerus and femur bones, are inefficient and prone to muscle rupture, lacking in operator ergonomics and automation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system involving a support device that holds the leg by the lower end of the bone, a meat removing device with multiple pivotable plates that follow the bone's contour, and a controlled movement pattern to sever muscle fibers and remove meat efficiently, including pre-cutting and iterative movements to ensure robust and reliable deboning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual deboning methods are used on bones with irregular profiles, then the process is flexible, but the efficiency is low and muscle rupture occurs frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeboning efficiencyVSAvoidmuscle rupture prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The meat removing device is designed with multiple pivotable plates that can dynamically adjust their positions and orientations to follow the irregular contour of different bone shapes. This dynamic adaptability allows the device to maintain effective contact with meat across varying bone geometries, improving deboning efficiency while preventing muscle rupture through controlled, adaptive movement rather than rigid force application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The meat removing device is segmented into multiple independent plates that can pivot and move relative to each other. This segmentation allows each plate to independently adapt to local bone contours while collectively covering the entire bone surface, enabling efficient meat removal without concentrating stress on single points that could cause muscle rupture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If automated deboning systems are implemented, then operator ergonomics improve, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator ergonomicsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a dynamically adjustable meat removing device with pivotable plates that can adapt to different bone geometries automatically. This dynamic design reduces the need for multiple specialized tools and manual adjustments, simplifying operator interaction while maintaining high automation capability, thus improving ergonomics without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The meat removing device with its multiple pivotable plates serves multiple functions: it can process various bone shapes and sizes, adjust to different meat distributions, and operate in different positions. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple specialized devices into a single system, improving operator ergonomics while controlling overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If iterative meat removing movements are executed, then meat is removed more reliably from bone, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeat removal reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The iterative meat removing movements are designed to be continuous and overlapping, with each pass removing a layer of meat and exposing new surfaces for subsequent passes. The pivotable plates maintain continuous contact with the bone, and the iteration process is streamlined to minimize idle time, ensuring reliable meat removal while optimizing processing speed through uninterrupted action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial meat removal in each iterative pass, focusing on specific regions rather than attempting complete removal in a single action. This partial action approach allows multiple targeted passes to efficiently remove all meat through cumulative effect, improving reliability while managing total processing time through strategic, focused iterations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4203690B1Method and system for deboning of a carcass leg part of a four legged slaughter animal, for removing meat from a bone of the carcass leg part
Publication Date: 2024.09.25 MAREL RED MEAT BV
  • EP4203690B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4203690B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4203690B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method and system of removing meat from a bone of a carcass leg part, comprising the subsequent steps of: a) holding, by a support device, of the leg part, b) moving a meat removing device: into a pre-cut, c) then away from the support device along the bone to a first end position so that meat is removed from the bone, d) then away from the bone, forcing meat away from the bone and severing further meat from the bone, e) then towards the support device, f) and then towards the bone, g) and then again away from the support device along the bone to a second end position distanced further from the support device than the first end position so that further meat is removed from the bone.