Pixelated Semiconductor Detector Calibration for Energy Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semiconductor radiation detectors in nuclear medicine imaging systems suffer from variations in response, leading to image degradation, non-linearity in energy response, and unresponsiveness of pixels, which complicates the detection of subtle features and prevents simultaneous imaging of certain isotopes due to energy overlap and poor energy resolution.

Innovation Solution

A method for calibrating pixelated semiconductor radiation detectors by acquiring energy response data and performing energy and sensitivity calibration on a pixel-by-pixel basis, optionally including bad pixel marking or interpolation, to correct for energy scale offsets and non-linear responses, and account for slow time variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If pixelated semiconductor radiation detectors are used to acquire imaging data, then imaging capability is improved, but response variations between pixels cause image degradation and reduce measurement precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging capabilityVSAvoidresponse uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary calibration action by acquiring energy response data for each pixel before actual imaging operations. The system performs energy calibration and sensitivity calibration in advance to establish correction factors that compensate for pixel-to-pixel variations, thereby improving measurement precision without sacrificing imaging capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the energy response parameters of each pixel through calibration procedures. By adjusting energy calibration parameters and sensitivity factors based on measured response data, the system equalizes the response across all pixels, transforming the non-uniform detector array into a uniformly responding imaging system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If energy calibration is performed on pixelated detectors, then energy resolution is improved, but dual isotope imaging is prevented due to energy overlap

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy resolutionVSAvoiddual isotope imaging capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by performing pixel-specific energy calibration to optimize energy resolution for each pixel's local characteristics. Simultaneously, it implements adaptive energy windowing that can be adjusted for different isotopes, allowing the system to maintain high energy resolution while accommodating dual isotope imaging by selectively applying different energy analysis parameters to different pixels or time points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If non-linear energy response is present in detectors, then manufacturing is simplified, but measurement precision deteriorates due to non-proportionality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector fabricationVSAvoidenergy linearity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by measuring the actual non-linear energy response of each pixel and using this information to generate correction factors. The system continuously monitors energy response characteristics and applies computational corrections during image reconstruction, thereby compensating for manufacturing-induced non-linearities without requiring more complex detector fabrication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If pixel unresponsiveness occurs, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability decreases due to operating failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepixel operationVSAvoidpixel functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by implementing automated bad pixel detection and correction algorithms that identify and compensate for unresponsive pixels without requiring manual intervention. The system automatically flags problematic pixels, interpolates their values from neighboring pixels, or applies correction factors, thereby maintaining high reliability while keeping the operational system simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves image quality, enables simultaneous dual isotope imaging, and reduces the need for frequent system maintenance, enhancing clinical accuracy and reducing costs by stabilizing the imaging system and optimizing radiation data usage.

Implementation Method 1

The response of these semiconductor radiation detectors to radiation is a localized current pulse that is detected by localized electronic circuits

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS7872221B2Apparatus and methods for calibrating pixelated detectors
Publication Date: 2011.01.18 GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS ISRAEL LTD
  • US7872221B2 patent drawing
  • US7872221B2 patent drawing
  • US7872221B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and methods for calibrating pixelated detectors are provided. A method includes acquiring energy response data for a plurality of pixels of the pixelated semiconductor radiation detector and performing at least one of energy calibration and sensitivity calibration on each of the plurality of pixels based on the acquired energy response data.