Multi-mode Plasma Control for Impedance Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current plasma systems face challenges in effectively controlling plasma impedance during different processes, such as etching and deposition, as existing methods fail to accurately adjust power and frequency based on varying states, leading to suboptimal process outcomes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that uses multiple control modes within a plasma system, where different variables like RF power, RF voltage, and ion energy are employed based on specific states to control plasma impedance, with a processor determining the appropriate variable to use based on measurements and thresholds to optimize power supply.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single control mode is used for plasma systems, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to different process states (etching vs deposition) deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different process statesVSAvoidcontrol mode complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically switches between different control modes (first control mode for etching, second control mode for deposition) based on the detected plasma state. This allows the system to adapt to different process conditions without requiring separate fixed systems for each mode, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes control parameters (such as RF power, gas flow rates, or pressure) based on the detected plasma state to optimize performance for different processes. By adjusting parameters rather than requiring entirely different control architectures, the system achieves adaptability while maintaining manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If power and frequency are not adjusted based on plasma state, then the control system is simpler, but the manufacturing precision of plasma processes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplasma process precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses feedback from plasma state detection (through measurements of impedance, power reflection, or other plasma parameters) to automatically adjust power and frequency settings. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables precise control of plasma processes while keeping the control system architecture relatively simple through automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple control modes are implemented, then the adaptability to different processes improves, but the ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess control adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol system operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically detects the plasma state and selects the appropriate control mode without requiring manual intervention or complex user decisions. The system serves itself by making intelligent decisions based on real-time plasma conditions, thereby maintaining ease of operation while achieving high adaptability through automated multi-mode control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10325759B2Multiple control modes
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 LAM RES CORP
  • US10325759B2 patent drawing
  • US10325759B2 patent drawing
  • US10325759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for using variables based on multiple states associated with a plasma system are described. A method includes determining whether the state associated with the plasma system is a first, second, or third state and determining a first variable upon determining that the state is the first state. The method further includes determining a second variable upon determining that the state is the second state and determining a third variable upon determining that the state is the third state. The method includes determining whether each of the first variable, the second variable, and the third variable is within a corresponding range from a corresponding threshold. The method includes providing an instruction to change power supplied to a plasma chamber upon determining that the first, second, or third variable is outside the corresponding range from the corresponding threshold.