Wafer-Scale Plasmonic Substrates with Tunable Nanogaps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies face challenges in developing plasmonic substrates with nano-scale gaps, particularly sub-10 nm or sub-5 nm gaps, for large-area applications such as SERS, SPR, and plasmon-enhanced devices, as existing methods like electron beam lithography are not suitable for reproducible fabrication on wafer scales and often result in larger gap sizes.

Innovation Solution

The development of plasmonic substrates with one-dimensional and two-dimensional nanostructure arrays on a wafer scale, featuring nano-scale gaps including sub-10 nm or sub-5 nm gaps, achieved through methods like deep UV lithography, FIB milling, and epitaxial growth, allowing for controlled EM field enhancement and tunable gap sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If electron beam lithography is used to fabricate plasmonic substrates, then manufacturing precision can be improved, but productivity deteriorates due to unsuitability for reproducible fabrication on wafer scales

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegap size controlVSAvoidwafer scale fabrication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The fabrication process is divided into multiple stages: first forming mandrels with deep UV lithography, then using FIB milling to create precise nano-gaps, and finally depositing metallic coatings. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently, combining the throughput of wafer-scale lithography with the precision of FIB milling for gap formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Mandrels are introduced as intermediary structures that define the gap regions. These mandrels are formed using deep UV lithography and then selectively removed or modified via FIB milling to create the desired nano-scale gaps. The mandrels act as templates that enable precise gap control while maintaining compatibility with wafer-scale fabrication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If larger gap sizes are used in plasmonic substrates, then ease of manufacture is improved, but EM field enhancement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication simplicityVSAvoidEM field enhancement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The gap size parameter is precisely controlled within the 5-50 nm range, with optimal performance achieved at smaller gaps. By using FIB milling to etch mandrels, the process achieves narrow gap dimensions that maximize EM field enhancement while remaining manufacturable through controlled removal of mandrel material rather than direct gap formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The FIB milling process removes more mandrel material than the minimum required, creating gaps that are slightly larger than the theoretical optimum but ensuring complete mandrel removal and clean gap formation. This partial over-etching approach balances the need for small gaps with the practical constraints of mandrel removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables reliable and reproducible fabrication of plasmonic substrates with enhanced EM field enhancements, improving sensing capabilities for chemical, biological, and biomedical species, as well as enhancing the performance of solar cells and light sources by achieving high EM field enhancements across large areas.

Implementation Method 1

The enhancement of EM fields in the vicinity of metallic nanoparticles, metallic nanostructures on a substrates, as well as on the surface of thin metallic films can be explained by the phenomenon of localized surface plasmon resonance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLocalized surface plasmon resonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

The film based SPR could be based on excitation of surface plasmons in nanometer scale thin metallic films by radiation at specific wavelengths of light incident at a certain angle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface plasmon resonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 3

FIB milling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon beam: Ion Beam

Implementation Method 4

deep UV lithography

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltraviolet light: Light

Implementation Method 5

epitaxial growth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEpitaxy: Epitaxy

Data Source

PatentUS20110166045A1Wafer scale plasmonics-active metallic nanostructures and methods of fabricating same
Publication Date: 2011.07.07 US SEC THE ARMY THE
  • US20110166045A1 patent drawing
  • US20110166045A1 patent drawing
  • US20110166045A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Plasmonics-active nanostructure substrates—developed on a wafer scale in a reliable and reproducible manner such that these plasmonics-active nanostructures have nano-scale gaps (that include but are not limited to sub-10 nm gaps or sub-5 nm gaps) that provide the highest EM field enhancement between neighboring plasmonics-active metallic or metal-coated nanostructures. The plasmonics-active nanostructure substrates relate to environmental sensing based on SERS, SPR, LSPR, and plasmon enhanced fluorescence based sensing as well as for developing plasmonics enhanced devices such as solar cells, photodetectors, and light sources. Controllable development of sub-2 nm gaps between plasmonics-active nanostructures can also be achieved. Also, the size of the nano-scale gap regions can be tuned actively (e.g., by the application of voltage or current) to develop tunable sub-5 nm gaps between plasmonic nanostructures in a controllable manner.