Automated Polishability Testing Apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating the polishability of materials and the performance of polishing devices rely heavily on human intervention, lacking proper control over test parameters such as applied force, contact distance, and movement, and lack feedback control mechanisms in dynamic testing environments.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising initial surface finish preparation, surface roughness measurement, height measurement, gloss measurement, polishing device testing apparatus, and communication, control, and data processing software, which allows for precise and repeatable control of test parameters through motorized stages, force sensing, and computer-controlled software to ensure accurate and consistent testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If human intervention is used to control test parameters, then the testing process is simpler to operate, but the precision and repeatability of test parameters deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting process operationVSAvoidtest parameter precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with an automated testing system that uses computer-controlled actuators, motors, and feedback sensors to precisely control test parameters such as applied force, contact distance, and movement, eliminating human intervention while maintaining ease of operation through software interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback control mechanisms where sensors continuously monitor test parameters and automatically adjust them to maintain precision, with data fed back to the control system to ensure repeatability and accuracy throughout the testing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If human intervention is used to control test parameters, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of test results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting device complexityVSAvoidtest result reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback control mechanisms where sensors continuously monitor test parameters and automatically adjust them to maintain precision, with data fed back to the control system to ensure repeatability and accuracy throughout the testing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated testing system performs self-regulation of test parameters through embedded control algorithms that automatically adjust force, position, and movement without human intervention, ensuring consistent and reliable test results while reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If feedback control mechanisms are added, then the measurement precision improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest parameter measurement precisionVSAvoidtesting device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback control mechanisms where sensors continuously monitor test parameters and automatically adjust them to maintain precision, with data fed back to the control system to ensure repeatability and accuracy throughout the testing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system serves multiple functions including data acquisition, real-time parameter adjustment, quality control monitoring, and automated reporting, consolidating these capabilities into a single integrated software platform that manages the entire testing process without requiring separate complex subsystems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables highly accurate and repeatable assessment of polishability and performance of materials and polishing devices, providing quantitative data for establishing standards and comparing the efficacy of different materials and tools.

Implementation Method 1

a linear, motorized translation stage to move the rotating sample into contact with the rotating turntable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

The apparatus includes a mounting device that allows the test specimen to be positioned beneath a surface profilometer with accuracy and repeatability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface Profilometry: Scanning Probe Microscopy

Implementation Method 3

The apparatus is comprised of an electronic height indicator mounted on a two-axis positioning table

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectronic Height Measurement: Scanning Probe Microscopy

Implementation Method 4

This apparatus enables a user to measure changes in gloss on the surface of a test specimen during the testing procedure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight Reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 5

The apparatus includes a force sensing holder or mount that accurately reports force applied to the specimen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS8657645B2Methods for testing the polishability of materials
Publication Date: 2014.02.25 ADA FOUND
  • US8657645B2 patent drawing
  • US8657645B2 patent drawing
  • US8657645B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for measuring the polishability of a solid material such as a dental restorative material includes using a series of apparatus to perform the steps of forming the material into a desired specimen with a generally planar surface, conditioning the surface by abrasion, measuring the abraded surface with a profile determination device, optionally measuring the amount of material abraded from the surface and the gloss of the abraded surface, polishing a portion of the abraded surface with a polishing device at a controlled load for a pre-determined time and measuring the roughness and/or gloss of the polished surface followed by comparison thereof to the corresponding measurements of the unpolished, conditioned portion of the specimen surface. Polishing materials and devices may also be tested using the apparatus and method for polishing a standardized material.