Semiconductor Polishing Pad Variance Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Polishing processes for semiconductor substrates often result in edge roll-off due to uneven mechanical and chemical forces, leading to variability in wafer flatness and surface roughness, particularly caused by pad-to-pad variance in polishing pads.

Innovation Solution

A method that adjusts the polishing sequence based on measured edge roll-off, using a combination of silica-containing and alkaline slurries, with varying concentrations and application times, to minimize edge roll-off and maintain substrate flatness, by controlling the amount of polishing slurry supplied to the pad during the polishing process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a polishing process is used to improve wafer flatness and surface roughness, then the front and back surfaces become extremely flat and parallel, but edge roll-off occurs due to uneven distribution of mechanical and chemical forces near the edge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer flatness and surface roughnessVSAvoidedge roll-off
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different polishing slurries (silica-containing and alkaline) with varying concentrations and application times to different regions of the wafer. The silica-containing slurry is applied longer to edge regions experiencing higher roll-off, while alkaline slurry is applied to central regions, creating locally optimized polishing conditions that address the non-uniform mechanical and chemical forces across the wafer surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If polishing pads are used with allowed manufacturing tolerances, then the polishing process is cost-effective and easy to manufacture, but pad-to-pad variance causes variability in edge roll-off of polished substrates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolishing pad manufacturingVSAvoidedge roll-off consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system where the actual edge roll-off measured from polished wafers is compared to a target value, and the polishing slurry application parameters (concentration, flow rate, application time) are dynamically adjusted in subsequent polishing cycles to compensate for deviations caused by pad-to-pad variance, thereby maintaining consistent edge roll-off despite manufacturing tolerances in the polishing pads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Shape

If the polishing slurry amount is increased to reduce edge roll-off, then edge roll-off is minimized, but the complexity of controlling the polishing process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge roll-off controlVSAvoidpolishing process control
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic control of polishing slurry application by continuously adjusting slurry flow rates and application times based on real-time measurements of edge roll-off and pad condition. The system transitions from static, fixed-parameter polishing to a dynamic process where slurry delivery is actively modulated to maintain optimal polishing conditions throughout the process, enabling precise edge roll-off control without excessive complexity through adaptive algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces edge roll-off and improves substrate flatness and surface roughness by dynamically adjusting the polishing process to account for pad-to-pad variance, ensuring consistent results across multiple polishing steps and pad lifetimes.

Implementation Method 1

A polishing slurry is supplied to the polishing pad to polish the front surface of the semiconductor substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical abrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

uneven distribution of mechanical and/or chemical forces near the edge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reactions: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

uneven distribution of mechanical and/or chemical forces near the edge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP3849742B1Methods for polishing semiconductor substrates that adjust for pad-to-pad variance
Publication Date: 2022.10.05 GLOBALWAFERS CO LTD
  • EP3849742B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3849742B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3849742B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods for polishing semiconductor substrates that involve adjusting the finish polishing sequence based on the pad-to-pad variance of the polishing pad are disclosed.