Polymer Electrospray Emitter for Stable Ion Emission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrospray emitters face issues with unstable emission processes, contamination, and reduced operational lifetimes due to material and geometry variability, leading to off-axis emissions and material degradation, particularly in dense emitter arrays.

Innovation Solution

The use of a substantially non-porous ionic electroactive polymer (IEP) as the material for electrospray emitters, which allows ions and liquid ion sources to diffuse through its solid bulk, enabling precise shaping of emitter tips and stable ion emission with improved thrust efficiency and extended operational stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional ceramic or metallic porous emitters are used, then ion emission can be achieved, but the emission process becomes unstable and operational lifetime is reduced due to material variability and contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission stabilityVSAvoidcontamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from conventional porous ceramic or metallic materials to ionic electroactive polymer (IEP) materials. This parameter change fundamentally alters the emission mechanism from porous capillary flow to bulk diffusion, eliminating the harmful effects of material variability and contamination associated with conventional porous emitters while maintaining stable ion emission and extending operational lifetime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs ionic electroactive polymer (IEP) materials that combine ionic conductivity with electroactive properties. This composite material approach enables the emitter to simultaneously achieve stable ion emission, resistance to contamination, and extended operational stability by utilizing the unique properties of IEPs that differ from conventional homogeneous ceramic or metallic materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If porous materials are used for emitter construction, then liquid ion source can be fed through capillary pressure, but geometry variability leads to off-axis emissions and reduced thrust efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust efficiencyVSAvoidemitter geometry uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the transport mechanism parameter from capillary pressure-driven flow in porous materials to bulk diffusion in solid IEP materials. This parameter change eliminates the geometry variability issues inherent in porous structures, enabling precise shaping of emitter tips and ensuring consistent on-axis emissions that maximize thrust efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If dense emitter arrays are deployed, then ion emission rate increases, but material degradation and electrical shorts occur more frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveion emission rateVSAvoidoperational lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material composition parameter from conventional porous materials to ionic electroactive polymers (IEPs). This parameter change enables dense emitter array deployment by providing a material that resists degradation and electrical shorts, allowing high ion emission rates to be maintained while extending operational lifetime through the inherent stability of IEP materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The IEP emitters exhibit enhanced efficiency with approximately 10 times greater thrust compared to conventional ceramic or metallic emitters, maintaining stability for multiple hours and enabling operation at ambient temperatures, while reducing contamination and electrical shorts.

Implementation Method 1

allows ions and liquid ion sources to diffuse through its solid bulk

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

applying a voltage differential to one or more emitters, and diffusing a liquid ion source through a material of the one or more emitters, and emitting ions from a tip of each of the one or more emitters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrospray: Electrohydrodynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240082858A1Method and apparatus for a polymer electrospray emitter
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH
  • US20240082858A1 patent drawing
  • US20240082858A1 patent drawing
  • US20240082858A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Polymeric electro spray emitters and related methods are generally described. In some embodiments, an emitter may be made from an ionic electro active polymer. The composition of the electro spray emitters described herein may enable the transport of ions and/or liquid ion sources, such as an ionic liquid or room temperature molten salt, through the bulk of the polymeric emitter. In some embodiments, the described emitters may be fabricated using a mixture of an ionic electroactive polymer, a solvent, and a liquid ion source to at least partially mitigate swelling effects of the polymer emitter that may otherwise occur when the one or more emitters are exposed to the liquid ion source during operation.