Porous Electrode with Encapsulated Molecular Catalyst for CO2 Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for CO2 electrochemical reduction require high energy input and result in unstable, non-selective products due to the lack of efficient catalytic systems, particularly for multi-electron and multi-proton processes.

Innovation Solution

Development of porous electrodes with a conductive nanoporous catalytic matrix that encapsulates molecular catalysts within structured oxide nanolayers, enhancing catalytic activity and stability while using minimal molecular material, and allowing for easy tuning of the oxide and catalyst nature.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If molecular catalysts are used for CO2 electrochemical reduction, then catalytic selectivity and current density improve, but catalyst stability and integration into electrode structures deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic activityVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes a nanoporous oxide matrix as the electrode structure, which provides high surface area and porosity to accommodate molecular catalysts. The porous structure allows efficient mass transport of CO2 and protons to the catalyst sites while maintaining structural integrity, thereby improving catalytic activity without compromising stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite material system combining molecular catalysts with oxide matrices through electrodeposition. This composite structure integrates the high catalytic selectivity of molecular catalysts with the structural stability and conductivity of oxide materials, resolving the contradiction between catalytic activity and catalyst stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If encapsulation methods like atomic layer deposition are used, then catalyst stability improves, but process complexity and manufacturing difficulty worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst stabilityVSAvoidencapsulation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the encapsulation function and catalyst integration into a single electrodeposition process. Instead of separate encapsulation steps like ALD, the oxide matrix is deposited in one step while simultaneously incorporating the molecular catalysts, thereby improving catalyst stability without increasing process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The electrodeposition process automatically performs both encapsulation and catalyst integration functions. The process self-organizes to embed molecular catalysts within the forming oxide matrix structure, eliminating the need for additional complex encapsulation steps and simplifying the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If high energy input is applied for CO2 reduction, then reaction rate improves, but energy efficiency and selectivity for multi-electron processes worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electrochemical parameters by using molecular catalysts that lower the activation energy for multi-electron CO2 reduction. This allows the reaction to proceed at lower overpotentials with higher energy efficiency, while the nanoporous oxide structure maintains high reaction rates through enhanced mass transport and active site accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The approach improves catalytic activity and selectivity for CO2 reduction, achieving high current densities and Faradaic efficiencies with reduced energy input, and is versatile for both electrochemical and photoelectrochemical processes.

Implementation Method 1

the conductive nanoporous catalytic matrix being realized by electrodeposition of metal ions from a solvent solution which comprises also solubilized molecular catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrodeposition: Electrodeposition

Implementation Method 2

a conductive nanoporous catalytic matrix on the substrate, which presents a hybrid of a metal oxide MO with nanopores and molecular catalyst which reduce CO2 or CO

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

a conductive or conductive transparent or photoconductive substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP4227441A1Porous electrode with a catalytic activity towards co2 or co electrochemical and photo-electrochemical reduction
Publication Date: 2023.08.16 UNIV PARIS CITE
  • EP4227441A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4227441A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4227441A1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

Porous electrode for electrochemical or photoelectrochemical reduction CO or CO2 comprising a conductive or conductive transparent or photoconductive substrate; a conductive nanoporous catalytic matrix on the substrate, which presents a hybrid of a metal oxide MO with nanopores and molecular catalyst which reduce CO or CO2, the conductive nanoporous catalytic matrix being realized by electrodeposition of metal ions of a solvent solution which comprises also solubilized molecular catalyst, the conductive nanoporous catalytic matrix comprising a structure of metal oxide MO with nanopores, which encapsulates and integrates homogeneously the molecular catalyst.