Robotic Port Placement Guide for Minimally Invasive Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current minimally-invasive surgical systems face challenges in determining optimal port locations for robotic surgery, leading to issues such as reduced access to the surgical site, increased risk of collisions between robotic arms, and failure to accommodate patient-specific and procedure-specific needs.

Innovation Solution

A port placement guide system that includes a base, a member with a tracking element, and a flexible joint, allowing for precise tracking and marking of suitable port locations on a patient's surface, enabling accurate placement and reduction of surgical setup time while minimizing arm collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If port locations are determined manually without a guide system, then the surgical setup time is reduced, but the precision and accuracy of port placement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveport placement precisionVSAvoidsurgical setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-calculating and identifying optimal port locations before surgery using computer modeling and simulation. The port placement guide is prepared in advance with pre-determined optimal positions, allowing surgeons to simply follow the guidance during surgery rather than determining positions intraoperatively, thus achieving high precision without increasing setup time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual copy of the patient's anatomy through 3D imaging and modeling, then uses this digital replica to simulate and determine optimal port locations. This virtual model allows for precise measurement and planning without requiring physical trial-and-error on the actual patient, thereby maintaining surgical efficiency while improving placement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple robotic arms are used to improve surgical capability, then the versatility of the surgical system is improved, but the risk of collisions between robotic arms increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical capabilityVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The port placement guide acts as an intermediary that coordinates the positions of multiple robotic arms. By establishing predetermined optimal port locations that account for the spatial relationships between multiple arms, the system mediates their interactions to prevent collisions while maintaining the versatility benefits of having multiple robotic arms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary simulation and analysis to identify optimal port locations that accommodate multiple robotic arms without collision. By pre-planning the spatial arrangement and port positions before surgery, the system eliminates the need for intraoperative adjustments and prevents collisions while maintaining full versatility of the multi-arm system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If standard MIS systems are used to reduce surgical complexity, then the ease of operation is improved, but the ability to accommodate patient-specific and procedure-specific needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical system simplicityVSAvoidpatient-specific accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing customized port placement guidance specific to each patient's anatomy and each procedure's requirements. Rather than using a one-size-fits-approach, the port placement guide is tailored to the specific surgical scenario, incorporating patient-specific anatomical variations and procedure-specific needs while maintaining the overall simplicity of the MIS system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adapting port location recommendations based on patient-specific anatomical parameters and procedure-specific requirements. The computer modeling system adjusts the optimal port positions according to varying parameters such as patient anatomy, surgical approach, and instrument requirements, allowing the system to maintain ease of operation while accommodating diverse individual needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240180647A1Robotic Port Placement Guide and Method of Use
Publication Date: 2024.06.06 AURIS HEALTH INC
  • US20240180647A1 patent drawing
  • US20240180647A1 patent drawing
  • US20240180647A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A port placement guide may include a base, a member, and at least one tracking element. The base can be configured to couple to a surface of a patient at a preliminary port location for a robotic arm. The member can be coupled to the base and can comprise a first end and a second end opposite the first end. The at least one tracking element can be coupled to the member and can be configured to allow tracking of the member relative to the preliminary port location.