Post-Parking Sensor Data Analysis for Driver Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing parking assistance systems provide real-time feedback during the parking process, which can be distracting and increase safety risks, and they lack the ability to analyze and optimize parking behavior post-parking for improved efficiency and reduced material consumption.

Innovation Solution

A method where sensor signals from the parking process are stored and evaluated separately from the vehicle's control unit, allowing for post-parking analysis and optimization instructions to be provided to the user in a non-distracting manner, using various sensors like ultrasonic, radar, and LIDAR, with data transfer via USB or radio links for detailed feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If real-time feedback is provided during the parking process, then the driver receives immediate guidance, but the driver becomes distracted and safety risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking guidanceVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs the evaluation and generates optimization instructions in advance, before the driver needs them. The parking process is recorded and evaluated afterwards, allowing the driver to receive guidance without real-time distraction while still benefiting from pre-computed optimization hints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation function is extracted from the real-time control loop and performed separately after parking completion. By separating the recording/evaluation phases from the actual parking maneuver, the system provides guidance without creating driver distraction during the critical parking operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If parking optimization analysis is performed after parking, then safety risks are reduced, but the ability to provide immediate feedback is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety riskVSAvoidfeedback delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by storing sensor signals during parking and subsequently evaluating them to generate optimization instructions. This feedback loop allows the driver to learn from analyzed parking behavior while maintaining safety, as the feedback is provided when the vehicle is stationary and the driver is not distracted

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital copy of the parking process through sensor signal recording. This copy can be analyzed without affecting the actual parking maneuver, allowing delayed evaluation and optimization instruction generation that does not compromise real-time safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If sensor data is processed in real-time during parking, then immediate optimization is possible, but system complexity and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol unit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs data acquisition and storage during parking, then conducts the complex evaluation and optimization analysis afterwards. This preliminary recording approach separates the simple real-time data collection from the complex post-processing, reducing the computational burden on the control unit during the actual parking maneuver

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The complex evaluation and optimization functions are extracted from the real-time control unit operations and performed separately. By removing the heavy computational tasks from the in-vehicle control system and performing them afterwards, the patent reduces control unit complexity while still achieving parking optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables users to analyze and improve their parking behavior, reducing fuel consumption, tire wear, and parking time, while enhancing safety and allowing for cumulative data analysis for further optimization, with the option to differentiate between users based on their driving styles and vehicle usage.

Implementation Method 1

which determine the length and the relative position of a parking space in relation to your own vehicle, for example using ultrasonic sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic: Ultrasound

Implementation Method 2

which determine the length and the relative position of a parking space in relation to your own vehicle, for example using ultrasonic sensors or radar sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Implementation Method 3

using various sensors like ultrasonic, radar, and LIDAR

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Data Source

PatentEP2539207B1Method to assist a parking maneuver
Publication Date: 2016.12.07 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP2539207B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2539207B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2539207B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention proposes a driving assistance system, comprising a control device having a storage unit for storing sensor signals, in particular during a parking operation in a parking space, in which the driver is given optimization suggestions during a subsequent evaluation on a processor that is separate from the control device.