Automotive Power Distribution Controller for Thermal Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power distribution systems lack efficient control mechanisms to manage current flow based on resistance differences between power and return lines, which can lead to temperature fluctuations and potential overheating in power cables, especially in automotive vehicles and battery chargers.

Innovation Solution

A controller is integrated within the automotive vehicle and battery charger to determine the resistance difference between the power and return lines, using sensors to measure current and voltage, and adjust the current flow through a buck regulator to maintain optimal temperature by cycling the transistor and controlling the duty cycle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current flow is increased to improve power transfer efficiency, then energy transfer rate improves, but temperature of power lines increases causing potential overheating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transfer efficiencyVSAvoidpower line temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the temperature of power distribution circuitry and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust current flow. The controller compares measured temperature against threshold values and modifies operating parameters accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that prevents overheating while maximizing power transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts current flow based on real-time temperature conditions rather than operating at a fixed current level. By cycling the transistor on and off and varying the duty cycle, the system adapts its power delivery to match thermal conditions, allowing high current when cool and reducing current when temperature rises.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If resistance difference between power and return lines is not controlled, then system complexity remains low, but thermal stress on cables increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mechanism complexityVSAvoidthermal stress on cables
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controller measures the actual resistance difference between power and return lines by monitoring voltage and current, then uses this feedback to adjust the duty cycle and compensate for the imbalance. This active compensation reduces thermal stress without requiring complex hardware modifications to the cable assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the duty cycle parameter of the transistor switching to compensate for resistance differences. By adjusting this single parameter, the controller balances the effective resistance seen by the load, reducing thermal stress on cables without physically modifying the cable construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If duty cycle is adjusted to control temperature, then temperature control precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control precisionVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller uses temperature sensor feedback to continuously monitor actual temperature and adjusts the duty cycle accordingly. This closed-loop control achieves precise temperature regulation by comparing measured temperature against target values and making real-time adjustments to the switching duty cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The transistor operates as a switch in periodic on-off cycles, with the duty cycle (ratio of on-time to total cycle time) adjusted to control average power delivery. This periodic switching approach enables precise temperature control through simple pulse-width modulation rather than requiring complex continuous control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively manages current flow to maintain the temperature of power and return lines within a desired range, preventing overheating and ensuring efficient energy transfer while minimizing thermal stress on the cables.

Implementation Method 1

determine a difference between a resistance of the power line and a resistance of the return line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Resistance: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 2

maintain the temperature of power and return lines within a desired range, preventing overheating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule Heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9132741B2Method and system for controlling current flow through a power distribution circuit
Publication Date: 2015.09.15 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9132741B2 patent drawing
  • US9132741B2 patent drawing
  • US9132741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automotive vehicle capable of receiving power from a power distribution circuit including a power line and return line includes a controller disposed within the vehicle. The controller is configured to be electrically connected with the power distribution circuit, determine a difference between a resistance of the power line and a resistance of the return line, and control a current flow through the distribution circuit based on the determined difference.